-support.

I believe they had enough justification to criticize your play.

!support
Could use some fresh & active blood in the br/ba section.

@Olafsenbo

In that case I will start flooding the ban request forum with ban requests where people refuse to kick TK. I assumed it needs to be evident beyond reasonable doubt but apparently ain't so.

Bump for the one who afked. Votekick is a vote and thus shouldn't be bannable if you choose not to vote.

Bump. Player is known to refuse to co-operate with teammates.

Bump

Bump

Bump. Player is known to be toxic and manipulative.

Replay Link : http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11744342.w3g Game Name : [ENT] Legion TD Mega #36 Your Warcraft III Username : Pyrosha@entconnect Violator's Warcraft III Username : Kayak@entconnect Violated Rule(s) : Pingspam, solo send, forcing send, verbally abusing a new p...

+1 Ultra toxic player and constantly harrasses and maraudes the game lobbies.

Ps. game name should be "[ENT] Legion TD Mega #36"

@bigtits is a known toxic community member. Don't bother arguing with him.

He forced a send and TK'd intentionally before level 1. Double infraction, also voting for a thread merge with the other thread made toward bbqtv for triple infraction. Processing.

It has been made clear to me ELO and amount of games played has nothing to do with punishment. Thus he should receive the standard +extra if there is previously malicious background. Processing.

Hey there,

Have a look at this @broud3r .


https://entgaming.net/customstats/legio ... /11727806/

https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=131690 Worked out well for you last time. Also nice job ruining your previous forum account's reputation on this thread and switching to a new one: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=138689 Edit: That being said, what you did isn...