"Do not refuse to learn/and or cooperate: this does not mean being new/bad is bannable." Taken directly from the rules wiki. Cooperating does NOT mean your team telling you to help them every single time they need it. Cooperating does mean acting in a way that will help you win the game. D...

Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/11715184/ Game Name : [ent] dota apem us/ca #74 Your Warcraft III Username : Hoaqin Violator's Warcraft III Username : Peter_North, Firefly, LapaiKypa, Boldx, YouMad?!, Precision, Dula Violated Rule(s) : Griefing, refusal to votekick acknowledged r...

Replay Link : https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/11714471/ Game Name : [ent] dota apem us/ca #34 Your Warcraft III Username : Delita Violator's Warcraft III Username : madar[a] Violated Rule(s) : Throwing Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : (16:01 / All) Madar[A]: THIS TEAM DESERVES TO LOSE (...

Can you please copy/paste some of the flame in chat so moderators don't have to go through the entire chatlog? Edit: went through myself (04:34 / Allied) marck_1997: when this guy know how to play (04:43 / Allied) Barfly: you picked a low hp hero (04:47 / Allied) marck_1997: we had (04:48 / Allied) ...

"As topic title ("Subject"): The violator's battle.net username and, if known, realm." Quoted from ban request wiki, putting the mods name to try and get seen faster is a violation. Please edit it.

Ultrakill I really think you shouldn't be weighing in on all of these appeals, it's a moderator issue. You shouldn't be leading the conversation and they shouldn't be trying to explain themselves to you. Watching that replay I don't believe you were throwing, but I DO see how people could believe so...

I agree from the premise of this, other team had no way of knowing and furi's gameplay could seem like ruining with some of his decisions. I think the primary two offenders should have been the only ones banned because it's easy to lose track of allies gameplay when they're always playing solo

Just rereading the chat alone is appalling, strongly second this.

I agree with OP on review of the game. Nothing Furi did was ban-worthy, even if people could find it irritating. I wouldn't recommend banning any but the initial two offenders as listed above. Excessive flame should also be taken into account. To those agreeing with the OP in chat: please stop tryin...

I hope; he will get a ban to cool alittle off; and try to not destroy the game atmospher by flamming or going ff My regards Ironic that when you don't get what you want you decide to be sarcastic instead of actually posting timestamps of afk or flame. You have TWO timestamps, about 30 minutes apart...

Replay Link :https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/11698862/ Game Name : [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #99 Your Warcraft III Username : Hierophant Violator's Warcraft III Username : [thanatos] Violated Rule(s) : Possible 3rd party program, item hiding Time of Violation (in-game or replay) : 18:30ish, right ...

Your Warcraft III username : Torval Realm/Gateway : entconnect Why are you banned : autoban for new account leaver Why you should be unbanned : I never left any game or disconnected, I was in a lobby that wasn't even full yet and my battery cable slid out shutting my laptop down. I don't even know ...

Without downloading the game all I could say is this: Was there any attempt by the moderators team to educate the "thrower?" Was his throwing obvious, if it was indeed so? I looked at the ban request and the player deserved his ban for the language alone, but for the people who didn't vote...

@dontworry It's still a clear sign of glitch abuse, and you clearly knew about it already. I'd change my recommendation from minimum ban to a longer one.

No, for game ruin you have to post multiple timestamps so that they can see it. 3 minutes of gameplay isn't enough to determine game ruin as somebody could just make a bad decision in that timeframe (though it can obviously show afk and refusal to defend). Mods have to go through a lot of requests s...