viewtopic.php?f=85&t=110777
Well, you are now on record saying you won't do it again and you are sorry, so as a first time offender I will reduce this unvouch to 1 day from now.
Processing..
Search found 433 matches
- Mon May 15, 2017 1:46 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Ban Appeal
- Replies: 3
- Views: 375
- Mon May 15, 2017 1:44 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Hodor game ruining
- Replies: 0
- Views: 331
Hodor game ruining
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9372737
Looseyourself unvouched 3 days for ruining (sold towers, did not push, did not control king properly, did not upgrade king to try and survive on 10).
Looseyourself unvouched 3 days for ruining (sold towers, did not push, did not control king properly, did not upgrade king to try and survive on 10).
- Sun May 14, 2017 9:38 pm
- Forum: LIHL Archive
- Topic: HealByColor
- Replies: 109
- Views: 9745
Re: HealByColor
Well, I think by the end there will need to be at least 70% of the votes in favor of his return before we even consider checking his application for skill ect.. At this time it is well below that, so unfortunately I would not get your hopes up too much HBC. We will end the voting sometime this comin...
- Sun May 14, 2017 5:33 pm
- Forum: LIHL Archive
- Topic: Dear Lihlplayers
- Replies: 3
- Views: 534
Re: Dear Lihlplayers
Archived.
- Sat May 13, 2017 3:28 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Ban appeal
- Replies: 33
- Views: 1666
Re: Ban appeal
Seeing as the user who appealed has now deleted his account, I think it's safe to say this is finalized.
- Fri May 12, 2017 4:31 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: ban appeal.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 598
Re: ban appeal.
Well, I will refer to this then if you ever have such an issue again. Diablo did say that he agreed with the ban and the reason, so with that being said, I will not lift it completely, but I will reduce the duration to 1 day from now. Please avoid this kind of problem in the future; even if your tea...
- Fri May 12, 2017 2:38 pm
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: No Gold in "DG"
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1003
Re: No Gold in "DG"
Yeah this looks to be a bad bug.. if he built within the parameters of what is allowed, this sort of thing should never happen.
@Broud3r
@Broud3r
- Fri May 12, 2017 2:33 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: ban appeal.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 598
Re: ban appeal.
Well, I will change the question then; if the majority of your team wants to send a different level, will you solo send? I do not see this as a problem you've had before, but still.. the chat kind of goes against what you are saying here. You clearly showed through the chat your contempt when sendin...
- Fri May 12, 2017 2:13 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: ban appeal.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 598
Re: ban appeal.
Whether or not you agreed with their call, there should have at least been an attempt by you to play within the team's calls. Sadly, this was not possible with all the ignoring and drama that took place, which is why I have been adamant both sides did wrong in this case. Since you have apologized, I...
- Fri May 12, 2017 2:10 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Ban appeal
- Replies: 33
- Views: 1666
Re: Ban appeal
Done.
- Fri May 12, 2017 12:59 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Ban appeal
- Replies: 33
- Views: 1666
Re: Ban appeal
Well, his ban was not for the votekick, so this is a moot point, but even then it was unnecessary. I think Kiwi's point is that he only said "solo sending" because you have to give an explanation why you votekick. That is really not Kiwi's fault, although it is poorly timed etc. I also be...
- Fri May 12, 2017 12:56 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: ban appeal.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 598
Re: ban appeal.
No ban has been lifted yet.
Also, if you plan on appealing, I would suggest putting a little more effort into it than just 1 statement with no depth to it.
Also, if you plan on appealing, I would suggest putting a little more effort into it than just 1 statement with no depth to it.
- Fri May 12, 2017 12:54 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Ban appeal
- Replies: 33
- Views: 1666
Re: Ban appeal
Okay, well simply put; both parties did wrong here. If you wanna talk only on elektro, well he got unvouched, so his case is done. He's not the one appealing. You are appealing your ban that you feel is wrong, and I am trying to show you just how messed up things were that led to this drama to begin...
- Fri May 12, 2017 12:43 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Ban appeal
- Replies: 33
- Views: 1666
Re: Ban appeal
It does not matter if the ghost had little-to-no impact, ghosting is ghosting. Based on that logic, I can antistuck to kill a boss I think I would have killed anyways, since then it had no impact right? I can go on and on about how that logic is nonsense, so please keep the discussion focused. Any i...
- Fri May 12, 2017 12:31 pm
- Forum: Processed Cases
- Topic: Ban appeal
- Replies: 33
- Views: 1666
Re: Ban appeal
Well, his ban was not for the votekick, so this is a moot point, but even then it was unnecessary. As I previously stated, whether intentional or not, this kind of thing has happened before, and there were never any forced votekicks and forced draws. Please show me one time that has ever happened, a...