Search found 1949 matches
- Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:29 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [ID] |cff8c00daplum@useast.battle.net
- Replies: 2
- Views: 421
Re: [ID] |cff8c00daplum@useast.battle.net
I have reviewed the replay. 26:00 - This is the point where stalling begins for me. Titan has killed all builders but 5. Morph and Demo in double base at Poseidon base. Mag and Mak double base at Bay. Sat is feeding/poking/lumbering (titan and sat are on same IP and appeared that titan wasn't trying...
- Wed Mar 21, 2018 11:53 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [ID] triggatriz@europe.battle.net
- Replies: 3
- Views: 506
Re: [ID] triggatriz@europe.battle.net
I have reviewed the replay. Confirmed in lobby chat that |cFF8C00Daplum and TriggaTriz share same IP. [System]: Player [|cFF8C00Daplum] has the same IP address as: TriggaTriz 0:19 - TriggaTriz starts with 3 dens at middle. 1:35 - TriggaTriz makes 5 more dens middle 3:50 - Two more dens mid. 9:00 - T...
- Wed Mar 21, 2018 6:20 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] [SilentPrime@europe.battle.net] (No mode announce in lobby)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 286
Re: [LTD] [SilentPrime@europe.battle.net] (No mode announce in lobby)
On this account, this is SilentPrime's only LTD game, and he downloads the map. Lobby chat shows that OP asked for normal mode and SilentPrime did not declare any other mode. SilentPrime is required to use -hpgmcb prophet or -phgmcb. [System]: [Silentprime@europe.battle.net] hasn't played any ga...
- Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:39 pm
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Rangeban: ImSoImba
- Replies: 3
- Views: 129
Re: Rangeban: ImSoImba
I'm not a mod, but I can almost promise you a mod will ask you this. This appeal can get resolved faster the sooner you can reply. Hello ImSoImba, Looks like you were caught in a rangeban. To get this sorted out, I'd appreciate it if you would answer the questions below: Provide a list of all your p...
- Wed Mar 21, 2018 2:09 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] dontwastetime.@europe.battle.net
- Replies: 5
- Views: 319
Re: [LTD] dontwastetime.@europe.battle.net
@MoreLossThanWin In these types of situations, users and mods must use their own discretion when reviewing replays. You say OP failed to listen to your communication. However, OP never received your communication because he !ignored you and AdWords_Editor at the start of the game for the following: ...
- Wed Mar 21, 2018 1:53 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] dontwastetime.@europe.battle.net
- Replies: 5
- Views: 319
Re: [LTD] dontwastetime.@europe.battle.net
I have reviewed the replay. 00:50 - OP !ignores DontWasteTime and AdWords_Editor almost immediately after game start. Judging by the flame throughout the game, these !ignore's are very reasonable. (00:26 / Allied) DontWasteTime.: ea cross? (00:34 / Allied) babuka: ok (00:39 / All...
- Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:03 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] Shady@useast.battle.net
- Replies: 3
- Views: 485
Re: [LTD] Shady@useast.battle.net
I have reviewed the replay. 2:25 - Shady initiates votekick against GruntsFR for solo sending 2 units on level 2. No one else votes. GruntsFR was trying to push his income up early, and I do not believe this votekick is warranted seeing as it was level 2. Because of this, I went through Shady's hist...
- Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:02 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] Legion-00 Europe.battle.net
- Replies: 2
- Views: 306
Re: [LTD] Legion-00 Europe.battle.net
I have reviewed the replay and Legion-00 !ignores two of his teammates prior to violation reported by OP. (00:02 / Allied) Legion-00: save (00:02 / Allied) CryptonoX: we ahead with one heal (00:02 / Allied) CryptonoX: and u try to ff? (00:02 / Allied) jaesang: y (...
- Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:38 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] Legion TD Mega several reports
- Replies: 2
- Views: 165
- Tue Mar 20, 2018 8:03 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] mher collpais
- Replies: 3
- Views: 552
Re: [DOTA] mher collpais
For a maphacking request to be approved, there must be significant evidence. You need to provide timestamps for when the suspicious activity you described in your post occured. "evidence of it throughout entire match" is not enough to go off of. If you do this, I would gladly review the re...
- Tue Mar 20, 2018 7:00 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: ridiculous ban?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 371
Re: ridiculous ban?
MianMianhae, I understand that you are frustrated with your ban. It can be challenging to play Dota with new players as text chat is not a fantastic way to coach/help them. However, new players have the same right the play the game that you do. In this game I saw no place where Brood failed to coope...
- Tue Mar 20, 2018 5:26 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [LTD] Nandesuka@asia.battle.net
- Replies: 3
- Views: 343
Re: [LTD] Nandesuka@asia.battle.net
I have reviewed the replay. Nandesuka has played 25 games on this account with ELO of 1023. 22:15 - Nandesuka decides to go for value before arena despite being 6/1. Teammates states that they need to focus on lumber earlier. Refusal to listen. (00:00 / Allied) Nandesuka: -next (00:00 / ...
- Tue Mar 20, 2018 12:42 am
- Forum: Processed Appeals
- Topic: Ban Apeal
- Replies: 7
- Views: 390
Re: Ban Apeal
I do know this player personally. I haven't seen him break a rule myself. I also know his friends that come over and play. More likely than not, I would suspect this ban dodge is related to one of them (if it is occuring). However, I cannot be certain and have bias here. Hope this is resolved for yo...
- Mon Mar 19, 2018 8:12 pm
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [DOTA] mianmianhae@uswest & 7 other players
- Replies: 4
- Views: 652
Re: [DOTA] mianmianhae@uswest & 7 other players
Before reviewing this replay, I went to check the game stats and saw that Ryuzaki has played 45 games of dota with a 909 ELO. Considering Dota's learning curve, it seems reasonable that the player might not have mastered every hero as there are over 100 heroes in the game (would recommend !alias to ...
- Mon Mar 19, 2018 7:14 am
- Forum: Processed Requests
- Topic: [dota]nonames@useast.battle.net
- Replies: 4
- Views: 289
Re: [dota]nonames@useast.battle.net
After reviewing the replay I see several violations during this game. 0:01 - Amuro takes bounty rune from NoNames. Players are fighting over mid and NoNames attempts votekick abuse in addition to saving game. (02:38 / Allied) Nonames: !votekick amur (02:38 / All) BullyBreeds: A votek...