[LTD] jucktdiekimme Europe

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

ChuDat
Armored Tree
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 3:35 pm

[LTD] jucktdiekimme Europe

Postby ChuDat » Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:23 pm

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9783788
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #16
Your Warcraft III Username: BBQTV
Violator's Warcraft III Username: jucktdiekimme
Violated Rule(s): game ruin
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): end of game
Any further thoughts: he pushed and didnt build for 12 even though he was holder and had 400 gold

ChuDat
Armored Tree
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: [LTD] jucktdiekimme Europe

Postby ChuDat » Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:26 pm

this is also not the first time he has done this search his name and you will see. longer ban may be needed since he is clearly doing this on purpose

KiwiLeKiller
Treant Protector
Posts: 601
Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 12:44 am
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 120 times

Re: [LTD] jucktdiekimme Europe

Postby KiwiLeKiller » Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:28 pm

Just fyi, he was afk. I doubt he didn't build on purpose. Anyway, he still broke a rule and deserves a ban.
"in a moment of extreme passion"
- Beastman (2017)

Zeratul

Re: [LTD] jucktdiekimme Europe

Postby Zeratul » Fri Sep 15, 2017 10:55 pm

Indrial wrote:What research? There you can see the LTD rules and that¨s just how it is. http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... g:LTDRules

Refusing to cooperate by sending alone and not save-send with teammates to win.

So if you will send with team, you can build/push however you want without breaking the rule...quite simple.


Not really - Sub-optimal plays can be considered 'not-bannable', however intentions are still used to judge it - ergo why every brq is judged on a case-by-case, and not generalized, but yes, some people might know what they're doing and are "trolling" without making it obvious, and slip by the first time(s) - Save those replays, build a case and report them (Might take time, but eventually, you will have enough proof to show he's trolling, and not just being 'bad')

PS: This might be a good idea to discuss in another section, and not on a current brq :P

Zeratul

Re: [LTD] jucktdiekimme Europe

Postby Zeratul » Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:24 am

After reviewing:

jucktdiekimme went afk around 23/24 minutes mark (No DRM selections after this) till game end

jucktdiekimme@europe.battle.net should be banned for prolonged afk (definitely had some impact as he dind't build being the team's holder)

User avatar
bezdak
Corrupted Treant
Posts: 1268
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 12:54 am
Location: Slovakia
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: [LTD] jucktdiekimme Europe

Postby bezdak » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:38 pm

User jucktdiekimme banned for impactful AFK, 5 days.

Processing.
"Flame don´t make people play better" - Wolke


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests