Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11128238.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1v1 #38
Your Warcraft III Username: remnant
Violator's Warcraft III Username: TheRareBambi
Violated Rule(s): 1. When picking a mode other than the default one (-hpgmcb prophet or -phgmcb), the mode setter (red) must announce it in the lobby before the game starts. Every player must be informed, so they have the opportunity to leave in case of dislike. 2. Do not flame, rage, troll, or insult other players excessively
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): At mode select and flaming at 1:03,1:19,1:27,2:04,16:32,16:37
Any further thoughts: Also he reported himself that he can or does dodge bans or possibly an admin with really bad ethics, see chat (04:10 / All) TheRareBambi: i have 2 more accounts and dynamic IP + the fact that i play this of boredom (06:29 / All) TheRareBambi: you're struggling quite hard for someone that can't be banned (09:38 / All) TheRareBambi: i am unbannable
[LTD] TheRareBambi@europe.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [LTD] TheRareBambi@europe.battle.net
You need to really focus on what you are saying.
59 / All) remnant: ok banned
Followed by durations can be considered as you having moderator authority and thus claiming to be staff, which is also bannable if reported. Just don't say anything other than report submitted (or better yet, nothing at all), and continue on.
Also, him flaming was fully instigated by you. The only thing he will be banned for, and likely less than 2 days depending on history, is incorrect mode chosen.
59 / All) remnant: ok banned
Followed by durations can be considered as you having moderator authority and thus claiming to be staff, which is also bannable if reported. Just don't say anything other than report submitted (or better yet, nothing at all), and continue on.
Also, him flaming was fully instigated by you. The only thing he will be banned for, and likely less than 2 days depending on history, is incorrect mode chosen.
Re: [LTD] TheRareBambi@europe.battle.net
I have never claimed to be a moderator or staff and that statement in no way insinuates such a claim. He broke a rule, he will be banned, I don't have to do it, nor am I claiming that I will do it. He will be banned, no question about it, so I stated such. Hence, "ok banned". I invite you to parse those two words by definition: “ok” – reasonably, “banned” – banned, which according to precedent established by processed ban requests is the consequence for breaking the rules.
- These users thanked the author Remnant for the post:
- roger5070mm (Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:05 pm)
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [LTD] TheRareBambi@europe.battle.net
There isn't a way around how you stated the player will be banned.
If you say ok banned and follow it with durations that gives the implication that you are a moderator. He obviously thought you were until you stated, much later, that ent will ban him.
Yes, he chose an unannounced mode and will be banned for it, but a moderator will advise you for the statements made as well.
If you say ok banned and follow it with durations that gives the implication that you are a moderator. He obviously thought you were until you stated, much later, that ent will ban him.
Yes, he chose an unannounced mode and will be banned for it, but a moderator will advise you for the statements made as well.
Re: [LTD] TheRareBambi@europe.battle.net
Ok, let's use an analogy so I can help you to better grasp this... "Someone is committing a crime against you, a crime that has a precedent set in the court of law to have the penalty of jail. You then state 'you are going to jail for this'. Does this mean that you are claiming that you are a Judge?" Of course not, that would seem ridiculous to assume that. The statement is made in confidence of the justice system, or in this case, confidence of the hosting staff. Ergo my problem with your assumption of my words.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [LTD] TheRareBambi@europe.battle.net
Alright. Here is one of many examples this has been banned for.
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=128726&p=500187&hilit=Admin+impersonation#p500187
While older, stomped explains why your statement can easily be misconstrued.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=86921&p=347071&hilit=Mod+impersonation#p347071
I am providing input as a former moderator and as an active member of the community who has been here for several years. This is a gaming community and the only time that real life scenarios are even relevant are in cases of history and in dodging bans.
A moderator will agree and confirm what it is stated above and will ban the violator you reported due to the unannounced mode. It is appropriate to remind you or, in this case, inform you so that you don't do the same in the future and get banned. That is all.
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=128726&p=500187&hilit=Admin+impersonation#p500187
While older, stomped explains why your statement can easily be misconstrued.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=86921&p=347071&hilit=Mod+impersonation#p347071
I am providing input as a former moderator and as an active member of the community who has been here for several years. This is a gaming community and the only time that real life scenarios are even relevant are in cases of history and in dodging bans.
A moderator will agree and confirm what it is stated above and will ban the violator you reported due to the unannounced mode. It is appropriate to remind you or, in this case, inform you so that you don't do the same in the future and get banned. That is all.
Re: [LTD] TheRareBambi@europe.battle.net
Well I will concede that, as in many aspects of life, we find ourselves at the mercy of the unwise. "narcissism is the eyes of the blind" - Remnant
- sl4ck
- Poison Treant
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 12:26 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Re: [LTD] TheRareBambi@europe.battle.net
@Remnant Piece of advice: Be humble. No need to belittle other users / mods. Looks especially bad when you are wrong.
You are going to get banned / I report you = You are going to jail
You are banned = I sentence you to jail
Please be more careful with your wording in the future.
lobby chat
TheRareBambi#europe.battle.net is banned 3 days for unannounced mode
remnant#useast.battle.net is warned for staff impersonation
Remnant wrote:Ok, let's use an analogy so I can help you to better grasp this... "Someone is committing a crime against you, a crime that has a precedent set in the court of law to have the penalty of jail. You then state 'you are going to jail for this'. Does this mean that you are claiming that you are a Judge?" Of course not, that would seem ridiculous to assume that.
You are going to get banned / I report you = You are going to jail
You are banned = I sentence you to jail
Please be more careful with your wording in the future.
Code: Select all
0:00 <TheRareBambi> 0x60: [Chat command] -hpgmcb
0:00 <TheRareBambi> 0x10: Immediate order: [Hybrid] (flags: 0x0040)
lobby chat
Spoiler!
TheRareBambi#europe.battle.net is banned 3 days for unannounced mode
remnant#useast.battle.net is warned for staff impersonation
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests