Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11518494
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #67
Your Warcraft III Username: Jericho
Violator's Warcraft III Username: sassazin + Scourge team
Violated Rule(s): Anti-game + commnands abuse.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): min 28
Any further thoughts: Starting from minute 28, our sniper sold all items, starting intentional feed and buying couriers. He even tried to votekick me, just to avoid starting me to votekick him. Creatures like him should not exist in gaming. Probably he is not more than 14.
Note that when we tried to kick them , opposite team didn't kicked at all, they enjoyed this feeding. Can't believe where ENT level has reach.
They enjoy a free win. Note that my language was not good in the game, I was triggered and I am sorry for that. They deserver ban aswell.
[DOTA] DotA apem us/ca #67 / sassazin @useast.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: [DOTA] DotA apem us/ca #67 / sassazin @useast.battle.net
2906 sniper sells items, buys couriers, and feeds them at 3134. He then intentionally feeds himself multiple times.
sassazin banned 3 weeks for heavy game ruin.
Multiple votekick attempts.
Just looking at the first 3, in a case of obvious game ruining:
clid and yubaibai888 failed to vote and are each banned 2 days.
(34:14 / Allied) Jericho: I will ban them after game
(42:15 / Allied) Jericho: I will just abuse and permanently ban sniper from all ent
@jericho such statements are considered admin impersonation and can result in a ban, so I caution you to use "i will submit for ban" instead.
sassazin banned 3 weeks for heavy game ruin.
Multiple votekick attempts.
Just looking at the first 3, in a case of obvious game ruining:
clid and yubaibai888 failed to vote and are each banned 2 days.
(34:14 / Allied) Jericho: I will ban them after game
(42:15 / Allied) Jericho: I will just abuse and permanently ban sniper from all ent
@jericho such statements are considered admin impersonation and can result in a ban, so I caution you to use "i will submit for ban" instead.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests