Game owner
Moderator: LIHL Staff
-
Cryptonox
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 5:20 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Game owner
Last player to sign should be owner, since he is most unlikely to be afk unlike player who started the game. Simple as fuck.
Some boys talk about not being afraid a man with a gun - Until it pops off, you don't even see where they turn - Using excuses about running to get his gun - But when we see him, he is hiding underneath his bed
-
Kreutertee
- Treant
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:23 pm
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
-
KiwiLeKiller
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 12:44 am
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
-
Kreutertee
- Treant
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:23 pm
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
Re: Game owner
We might only have a problem, when the current issue persists, that more than 8 people can sign, which happens from time to time. I've seen 9 ppl signed and someone said also 10 players have been signed at one point, after spam-sign-wars 
But I guess a simple rule like "if 4s game then owner = player8", that would also cover that issue.
But I guess a simple rule like "if 4s game then owner = player8", that would also cover that issue.
-
Diablo_
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:26 pm
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Game owner
Kreutertee wrote:We might only have a problem, when the current issue persists, that more than 8 people can sign, which happens from time to time. I've seen 9 ppl signed and someone said also 10 players have been signed at one point, after spam-sign-wars
Really, this happens? Make a screenshot next time you see it please.
-----
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK
-
Kreutertee
- Treant
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:23 pm
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
Re: Game owner
Diablo_ wrote:Really, this happens? Make a screenshot next time you see it please.
Yes, I tagged you the other day in discord channel when it happened, search for your explicit name-mentions in lihl-games channel. Shouldn't be too hard to find.
EDIT: found it. Last friday, 2 am.
- 9signed.PNG (66.21 KiB) Viewed 956 times
- These users thanked the author Kreutertee for the post:
- Diablo_ (Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:06 pm)
-
Diablo_
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:26 pm
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Game owner
I think the signing should be fixed now, no more too many players being able to sign.
If it still happens pm me pls!
About game owner:
When changing this I can see more problems/drama with 2v2 and 3v3 games though. Currently if someone starts a 2v2 game that person will be the game owner and can simply enforce this setup by starting the game. But if the last player becomes the game owner I can see people sign for 2v2 even if they don't actually want to play 2v2 and strongly convince/force other players to accept the swaps they will do.
Is it worth that? I can't remember the last time we had to start a new game cause the game owner wouldn't show up. Generally I like the idea of the one starting the game (and with that also making clear what the game type is) to be the owner more.
If it still happens pm me pls!
About game owner:
When changing this I can see more problems/drama with 2v2 and 3v3 games though. Currently if someone starts a 2v2 game that person will be the game owner and can simply enforce this setup by starting the game. But if the last player becomes the game owner I can see people sign for 2v2 even if they don't actually want to play 2v2 and strongly convince/force other players to accept the swaps they will do.
Is it worth that? I can't remember the last time we had to start a new game cause the game owner wouldn't show up. Generally I like the idea of the one starting the game (and with that also making clear what the game type is) to be the owner more.
Last edited by Diablo_ on Wed Nov 29, 2017 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
-----
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK
-
Kreutertee
- Treant
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:23 pm
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
Re: Game owner
Hmm, I guess there are valid points for both possibilities. Someone would have to make a judgement call on what is least likely to be abused and if the benefits would outweigh to even put work into that
Owner not showing up happens occasionally, but to be fair enough, I think both times I've seen it recently, haza was around to swap/start. Ofc can't rely on him being around all the time. I personally didn't feel it happens that often for something to actually be done about it.
Bottom line, idc
Owner not showing up happens occasionally, but to be fair enough, I think both times I've seen it recently, haza was around to swap/start. Ofc can't rely on him being around all the time. I personally didn't feel it happens that often for something to actually be done about it.
Bottom line, idc
-
dweiler
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
Re: Game owner
Yeah, we will stick with the first one being owner. People should not be afk anyway, you can report that.
You don't stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests