Spoiler!
Don_Killuminati wrote: I support if you promise me to not try to be mod anymore
after banning him for 2 weeks for his first offense ...
After handing out huge bans (from weeks out to months, for example banning 1007 for 1 month) and try to get rid of toxic and misplay (even against the rule books) and due circumstances and talks at Discord (yes even people begging me to come back as mod) i want to ask you all - Do you want me back as mod in LIHL?
TinSoldier wrote:Sure I don't agree with many of the penalties you give out but its a matter of perspective.
MickytheMousie wrote: Also @archol, don't stop moderating rulebreaks
FadingSuns wrote: Not pretending to judge specific cases but in my view, the Word a mod should worth more than any kind of rule, more if we talk about lihl, where we are all experienced players. I would disagree about taking archol out mods. In my experience, he has always tried to be neutral. idk about his feelings but i liked the way he moderated, think is a loss for the lihl community but w/e.
Marshmallows wrote:Archol leaves LIHL and it just falls apart.
Diablo_ wrote:Its archol
ZTX)Fiji wrote:archol start playing again pls >.<
Miyagi wrote: I have heard people praise past Mods, such as Archol, however I have not heard any praise regarding you? Do you not see that as a problem? Are you trying to seek the needs of the community and improve LIHL? I have not seen any evidence of this thus far.
EldryantheWise wrote: Diablo_ is definitely capable of judging vouches, and has done far more training on his own time of candidates (as well as recruiting) than any other candidate besides archol.
iG0D wrote: Well it seems like the only person who stuck up for u was archol and idk who he is