eplay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 236192.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #58
Your Warcraft III Username: pudgey
Violator's Warcraft III Username: NJELRC
Violated Rule(s): pause abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 14:45
Any further thoughts: Modding needs to be consistent, user should be banned for violating rules. He also went afk for 2 minutes in middle of game. The mod who denied this referenced me during the game. It should not make a difference who submits the request, you need to analyze if a rule was broken and how it was broken, not who is submitting the request.
[DOTA] NJELRC 2nd Opinion Requested from objective Mod
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Treant
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:16 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
[DOTA] NJELRC 2nd Opinion Requested from objective Mod
"you the biggest wack job on dead ent" -burberry; Flamer/Fan; DotA
-
- Treant
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:16 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: [DOTA] NJELRC 2nd Opinion Requested from objective Mod
Reporting rules being broken = trolling now...just lol. Total facepalm. And stay out of my thread, did you see me in your thread?
"you the biggest wack job on dead ent" -burberry; Flamer/Fan; DotA
- Jabba41
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 7435
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:56 pm
- Location: Germany - Hannover
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: [DOTA] NJELRC 2nd Opinion Requested from objective Mod
you need to analyze if a rule was broken and how it was broken,
-> We need to analyze how and in what situation and context a rule was broken. Try to figure the intentions behind it and evaluate the impact.
I agree with @beerlord judgement.
Denied.
Send me your best Sloth pictures for instant unban*
*individual results may vary
*individual results may vary
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 125 guests