Your Warcraft III username: tigerbowl
Violator's Warcraft III username: deathbydid0, ufuknsuck
Game name or map name: battleship
Stats page link:
Rule player violated: pooling; multi-boxes
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer):
Any further thoughts:
These two accounts are believed to be used by the same player. In the game, ufuknsuck did nothing but stay at the base, afk all game, keeping pooling deathbydid0 by sharing. This is admitted by deathbydid0 as he stated 'sharing will not be banned'.
However, in Battleship, the player with more gold will always has advantage. Thats why team with less players will always beat the team with more players, if players are at the same level, because each player will have much more gold.
By doing multi-box, deathbydid0/ufuknsuck enjoyed an unfair advantage. He is therefore hard to kill; the game was ruined.
I am pretty sure this is not the first time he did that because :
1.i have played with similar ID who make subaccount pool the main account by glitching. I did filed a ban request and got approved
2.check ufuknsuck's W/L and K/D, is like 88 wins/10 loses, while 2kills/2deaths per game. This means this account have been pooling for almost 100 games.
PLZ ban him again, and for more duration. THX
[Battleship ban request on deathbydid0, ufuknsuck]
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 11:05 pm
[Battleship ban request on deathbydid0, ufuknsuck]
- Attachments
-
- deathbydild0, ufuknsuck.w3g
- (444.28 KiB) Downloaded 27 times
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:08 pm
Re: [Battleship ban request on deathbydid0, ufuknsuck]
This request coming from a player that requires that others use the -share option. He is a notorious maphacker and it takes strategy to beat the only actual cheating that you can do on battlenet.
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3160
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:37 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: [Battleship ban request on deathbydid0, ufuknsuck]
@art)y I don't know about the mh but 'ufuknsuck' has a lonest afk time of 0:00 to 16:25 so it appears to be pretty clear cut multi-box.
I'm not sure if it is the same guy as before.
viewtopic.php?p=114233#p114233
viewtopic.php?p=114551#p114551
However the dildo and suck appear to be in games together if you check their history. If replay server was up I'd check if they pooled but its not so I won't. The ~25min wins are consistent with games that they did pool though.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=3237008
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=3236726
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=3236237
@edgeofchaos this guy has been banned for doing the same thing before https://www.entgaming.net/forum/viewtop ... 635#p85635
I'm not sure if it is the same guy as before.
viewtopic.php?p=114233#p114233
viewtopic.php?p=114551#p114551
However the dildo and suck appear to be in games together if you check their history. If replay server was up I'd check if they pooled but its not so I won't. The ~25min wins are consistent with games that they did pool though.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=3237008
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=3236726
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=3236237
@edgeofchaos this guy has been banned for doing the same thing before https://www.entgaming.net/forum/viewtop ... 635#p85635
Re: [Battleship ban request on deathbydid0, ufuknsuck]
Both banned for 30 days for second offense of setting up teams.
IHateMapHack, post a new topic if you have evidence against OP.
IHateMapHack, post a new topic if you have evidence against OP.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests