[LTD] albert-elnstein@europe.battle.net; razerpk@europe.battle.net; legiontdler@europe.battle.net

[Noreia]

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=6714901
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega euro #68
Your Warcraft III Username: Noreia
Violator's Warcraft III Username: albert-elnstein; legiontdler; razerpk
Violated Rule(s): votekick abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): round 6 (dont know exactly)
Any further thoughts:

he was cleary not afk. he was a noob thats all

(10:08 / All) ShadowHunterNZ: A votekick against player [vg3333m] has been started by player [Albert-Elnstein]. 5 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
(10:08 / All) ShadowHunterNZ: Type !yes to vote.
(10:08 / All) ShadowHunterNZ: ** Note: !votekick should only be used to kick players breaking a rule. You should not votekick players new to the game!
(10:11 / Allied) razerpk: !yes
(10:11 / All) ShadowHunterNZ: Player [razerpk] voted to kick player [vg3333m]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.
(10:16 / Allied) LegionTDler: !yes
(10:16 / All) ShadowHunterNZ: Player [LegionTDler] voted to kick player [vg3333m]. 3 more votes are needed to pass.
(10:23 / All) Albert-Elnstein: kick he is afk
(10:27 / Allied) Noreia: !afk
(10:30 / Allied) iomumu: !afk
(10:33 / All) Noreia: he isnt

[Jabba41]

As pink was a obviously new to the game and didnt communicated the whole game, even when his team gave him hints and wanted to help. But after about 10 minutes into the game it's not right to votekick someone for this imo. At least not on ENT18 or ENT96.

(10:23 / All) Albert-Elnstein: kick he is afk

-> But this is votekick abuse as he tried to kick someone for reasons that aren't true. But neither razerpk nor legiontdler supported his lies.

albert-elnstein@europe.battle.net should be banned for votekick abuse.
razerpk@europe.battle.net and legiontdler@europe.battle.net should get a warning for votekick abuse.

[Mercy]

albert-elnstein banned one year for dodging tid 58996
razerpk, legiontdler banned 4hr as a warning