[LTD] ww99 uswest.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Greymare
Treant
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 10:43 pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 4 times

[LTD] ww99 uswest.battle.net

Postby Greymare » Sat Oct 08, 2016 4:12 am

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=8441637
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Hell #77
Your Warcraft III Username: Greymare
Violator's Warcraft III Username: ww99
Violated Rule(s): Sending. No Team Play
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Wave 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 etc. Every wave
Any further thoughts: No regards for team play. No Respect toward more experienced player.
Greymare
Clan HELL Chieftain

User avatar
Nat
Forest Walker
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:20 am
Location: Clan BTI@USeast.battle.net
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: [LTD] ww99 uswest.battle.net

Postby Nat » Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:11 am

Review:

Seems to me like there was more of a 1 on 1 disagreement. ww99 was aiming to send, Gerymare to upg king.
Spoiler!
(01:32 / Allied) ww99: 234578
(01:45 / Allied) Greymare: what the fuck
(01:52 / Allied) ww99: 234578 send
(01:58 / Allied) Greymare: hell no'

(06:13 / Allied) Greymare: stop solo sending please

(09:18 / Allied) Greymare: stop solo sending or i will do a ban request
(09:31 / Allied) ww99: stop troll
(09:33 / Allied) ww99: send
(11:53 / Allied) ww99: send
(11:58 / Allied) Greymare: no'
(11:59 / Allied) ww99: 7
(12:01 / Allied) Greymare: up king
(12:05 / Allied) Greymare: idiot

(18:57 / Allied) ww99: noob mate no send
(19:06 / Allied) ww99: loss
(20:10 / Allied) ww99: stop up king
(20:12 / Allied) ww99: wtf noob
(20:23 / Allied) Greymare: fuck off noob troll idiot. enjoy your ban
(20:36 / Allied) ww99: joke
(20:44 / Allied) Greymare: yeah you are

In this case, I would think no one is in the wrong here. ww99's was asking for you to send, while you were asking for him to upg king and stop sending. It seems fair to me that ww99 is not banned, simply because they both could not manage to come to a decision.

But if ww99 is to be banned, all instances are as follows:
Spoiler!
00:04:48 Solo sends hermit

00:07:19 Solo sends 2 hermit's

00:08:50 Solo sends furbolg

00:15:04 Solo sends 2 chariot's, 2 blood orcs and 2 militia

00:17:25 Solo sends 1 whelp, blood orc, wyvern and 2 militia

There are more instances, but above is already more than enough evidence
Most people call me: C4
Before Nat anyways...

User avatar
SLSGuennter
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3075
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:39 am
Location: Ingame ... most likely
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: [LTD] ww99 uswest.battle.net

Postby SLSGuennter » Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:11 am

This was a 50% vs 50% call, and if we ban one player, we would have to ban the other aswell.
Denied, processing.
Gunther and the Sunshine-Girls. Hell Yeah


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests