Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=8441637
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Hell #77
Your Warcraft III Username: Greymare
Violator's Warcraft III Username: ww99
Violated Rule(s): Sending. No Team Play
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Wave 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 etc. Every wave
Any further thoughts: No regards for team play. No Respect toward more experienced player.
[LTD] ww99 uswest.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
- Nat
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:20 am
- Location: Clan BTI@USeast.battle.net
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: [LTD] ww99 uswest.battle.net
Review:
Seems to me like there was more of a 1 on 1 disagreement. ww99 was aiming to send, Gerymare to upg king.
In this case, I would think no one is in the wrong here. ww99's was asking for you to send, while you were asking for him to upg king and stop sending. It seems fair to me that ww99 is not banned, simply because they both could not manage to come to a decision.
But if ww99 is to be banned, all instances are as follows:
Seems to me like there was more of a 1 on 1 disagreement. ww99 was aiming to send, Gerymare to upg king.
Spoiler!
In this case, I would think no one is in the wrong here. ww99's was asking for you to send, while you were asking for him to upg king and stop sending. It seems fair to me that ww99 is not banned, simply because they both could not manage to come to a decision.
But if ww99 is to be banned, all instances are as follows:
Spoiler!
Most people call me: C4
Before Nat anyways...
Before Nat anyways...
- SLSGuennter
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:39 am
- Location: Ingame ... most likely
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 102 times
Re: [LTD] ww99 uswest.battle.net
This was a 50% vs 50% call, and if we ban one player, we would have to ban the other aswell.
Denied, processing.
Denied, processing.
Gunther and the Sunshine-Girls. Hell Yeah
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests