[DOTA] [time-remnanat europe]

[pokemon-rouge]

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9793863
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #69
Your Warcraft III Username: pokemon-rouge
Violator's Warcraft III Username: time-remnanat
Violated Rule(s): probably mh
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 46.55
Any further thoughts:Min 46 well slark engaged roshan alone, i decided to help him, we saw lina was top pushing like they were doing like 10/15 mins so we keep going on rosh, but slark without any vision on the map start say back, back, he even used zeus ulti to reveal ennemys team. Fisrt it was min 46 of the game and we never tried rosh before so it was not that obvious they come check rosh. When rosh had less than 1/3 of hp at 46.55 minute slarks used his lothars and started back before we can see ennemys, and 0.5 sec after axe appeared. Well with rosh so low hp his move was making no sense exept if he can see the whole map.

[Arcanium]

Reviewing

(Edit) Finished review and here's what I came up with.

Game Timer

10:10 ----- Zeus goes to gank axe who just showed up, but he warns him not to saying necro is in forest. Only way of knowing that necro was in forest was if he clicked sentinel creeps to see if they were being affected by aura, but he did not. Yet he still knew necro was waiting for the gank - Suspicious.

47:03 ----- Slark indeed uses lothars before Axe comes into vision, I for one don't know why he would do that but it sure seems dodgy. He did use Zeus' alt to reveal enemies but he was telling Husk to back instead of SK.

For the rest of the game I did not notice much else suspicious and I don't think it would be fair to ban a player from 1 or 2 suspicious moments.

If you do have any other replays of the player which you found some suspicious activity, feel free to post another ban request with time stamps as evidence to back this up. I personally would be glad to review that post so if you do PM me.

[BeerLord]

I agree with redmercedes's review. Suspicious at best, but insufficient grounds for maphack ban. I found no other evidence for maphack in the remainder of the game as well.
Denied.