ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 364258.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #92
Your Warcraft III Username: |c0000000000Noob
Violator's Warcraft III Username: meinert
Violated Rule(s): solo send lvl 3
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): at lvl 3
Any further thoughts: East team could clearly see the solo send and refused to kick. Meinert can choose to build his way even though all 3 of his teammates disagree but he solo send and has the nerve to say "its not solo send, i needed gold"

He did his math and he indeed needed 6g for the build he chose. He did not solo sent after this and he announced he needs 6g with the send.
You and red decided to flame him the whole game just because he chose to play his roll in a different way than you wanted him to play. He still played it decent and deserved no flame.
You tried to VK him after the first and only solo send, which he clearly stated was for income that he actually needed. Ofc the other team will not !yes in this case.

My advice is to fully deny this request.

@bezdak So if you need gold, it isn't solo send? If i need 125 gold for tok, can i send Demon kraken behe one lvl eariler? Given the fact that he had the option not to solo send if he had followed the team from the start, he is clearly at fault here.

Such a stupid thread. Guy who posted it is even more stupid. It was just 6g worth of send. That's like fucking nothing. You're just a petty idiot.

one instant at that point is not enough to warrant a ban specially as no call has been made at that point.
further flaming right from the start just cause you would build something else is not the way to go.
denied.