ENT Gaming

Your Warcraft III username: gkgough
Violator's Warcraft III username:s.c.a.r.f.a.c.e.
Game name or map name:dota
Approximate date/time of game (alternatively, link to a Stats page): http://atl.entgaming.net/replay/view_re ... 602483.w3g
Rule player violated:spamming, attempted votekick for no reason, and racist flaming
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer):entire game, specifically see these times: 0.22 - 0.20 (racist flaming) 3.00 (racist flaming) 4.00 Racist flaming (N-word, hang yourself n-word) 12.32 (more flaming) 15.40 (racist flaming) 16.30 (this is where he threatens to abuse his brothers admin status, the real problem in my opinion if true) 18.14 (more flaming)...you get the idea. Attempted votekick was somewhere around 25 mins.
Any further thoughts: this guy starts the game making comments at the other team that were offensive, then as game goes on, he decides to pretend he is some kind of ent god (which if he is will reveal a lot about ent in general, hopefully he was bluffing) and says i will be perma banned for asking him what problem he has with me. I also would like to know if his brother will abuse the privilege (says he is an admin and will perma ban me for no reason if he wants to) and ban me for literally doing nothing, not even being abrasive in chat.

And, according to this: https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/?u=s.c.a.r.f.a.c.e
He is already banned...why is he playing in the first place?!!?!

I think palsgraf made the ban after he finished with this game.

Since you were an ally of him, this is a valid request.
His flaming is clearly excessive.
Also:
(18:26 / Allied) S.C.A.R.F.A.C.E: sigh......
(18:32 / Allied) S.C.A.R.F.A.C.E: lucifer
(18:34 / Allied) S.C.A.R.F.A.C.E: enjoy ur last ent game
(18:37 / Allied) S.C.A.R.F.A.C.E: my brothers a admin
(18:40 / Allied) S.C.A.R.F.A.C.E: ur perma banned
This is, in a form, admin impersonation because it's calling someone an admin whos not in order to change behavior/scare someone.

So I'll add two days to his votekick abuse ban.
Thanks for reporting.

Just throwing in my two cents - I agree with Edge here. I couldn't ban for the flaming before since the requester was on the opposite team, but this request is valid.