ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 606565.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #80
Your Warcraft III Username: donotpingme
Violator's Warcraft III Username: controltheweak uswest.battle.net; themeasurer server.eurobattle.net; hate_stupids useast.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): game ruin, sending alone, feeding, refusing to send with team on Boss Round, multiboxing, juggling king, refusing to kick known game ruiner
Time of Violation (in-game or replay)through the entire game please see the replay text.
[b]Any further thoughts: 03:06 / Allied) TheMeasurer: forgot
03:13 / Allied) TheMeasurer: my volume is off
(06:17 / All) HATE_STUPIDS: good control
(06:19 / Allied) Skidush: is that -1?
(06:21 / Allied) Skidush: or -2?
(06:24 / Allied) donotpingme: !votekick control
(10:16 / All) donotpingme: red is also sending alone... feeding
(10:25 / All) donotpingme: !votekick control
(10:29 / Allied) Shadez: Yeah he confused me
(10:38 / Allied) TheMeasurer: let it be
(12:06 / All) controltheweak: yep 12 yr olds run wc3 now a days
(12:16 / Allied) TheMeasurer: ruin the team and game and lose
(12:39 / Allied) controltheweak: play a real team like league
(12:44 / Allied) Shadez: lol
(12:46 / Allied) controltheweak: this is just a time waster lol
(17:29 / All) Shadez: !votekick controltheweak
(18:47 / Allied) HATE_STUPIDS: red good control
Through the game control the weak did everything he could to hobble our team while feeding the opposite side and while refusing to send with the team. Meanwhile themeasurer shared his lane and refused to kick despite seeing the repeated violations, the constant leaking that he hid by using antistuck for a while. And the one who benefited from it all while refusing to kick was hate_stupids who has several variations of the same name that has been banned repeatedly for similar behavior. Which brings us to the suspicion of multiboxing.

Despite donotpingme making okay claims, truth be told i don't play many of LTD games, in my track record i had only played 6 games total. i was still learning, and wasn't even aware of most of the quote unquote offenses that i was doing at the time. if people play this game and act like how donotpingme acted like that in any other games, he would be reported for grieving, if someone cant get a grip and can not lead people into the right direction, then those people shouldnt be reporting, also as it stands if you want the die hard players, play this game, MAKE A REAL GAME THAT PEOPLE CAN DOWNLOAD, so you have those same people have the ability to play ranked. also i never left a game that i joined nor spoke harshly against people in these games that ENT has had hosted. to be clear donotpingme was the aggressor if anyone should be banned or even timmed banned it would be him, for ruining other people's fun, including my own. if i didnt feel like my time was wasted playing, why would i stay and play a game all the way through.

-controltheweak

@donotpingme Please provide timestamps/the levels he refused to send.

I watched the replay of this

Level 1 red solo send 1x warr without talking with rest of team.

Level 2 red sent 1x warr, blue forgot and purp didnt send due to no wood

Level 3 Red sent 1x warr again + mili, the king was juggled by red (or just bad control), cost a heal

Level 5 Red solo sends comm + 2x warr, so Purp sent comm and Blue 1x warr

Level 7 Red controls king again but doesn't try to kill the hermits until the end, would have lost the heal either way

Level 10 Red up kings even though everyone is sending

Says he is a new player, and if he isn't aware of how to play, nobody actually said to him not to solo send, or advised him on what to do
Nobody else took the king when they had the chance either.

@jabba41

He refused to send on round Ten. The boss round. I will edit when I get the exact time. 21:05 He is also claiming ignorance here in this venue that he appears to have found (despite his limited knowledge) before any ban took effect. Also as another person commented here of no warning there where at least three votekicks initiated listing the offensive behavior and the fact that it was bannable. He had full knowledge of what he was doing and was intentionally juggling the king. While mocking the admin servers. (12:06 / All) controltheweak: yep 12 yr olds run wc3 now a days

@donotpingme He provided timestamps which you did not, even though it's required from you. Without all the required info the BRQs might get simply denied. I'm not sure, what is your problem with that.
Both of you stop spamming BRQs. This is not the place for fights.
@Adamh91

Topic locked until reviewing.

Ignoring 1st vk as I don't think any malicious intent was behind king control.

2nd vk:

Not voted: themeasurer@eurobattlenet, hate_stupids@useast

3rd vk:

Not voted: Same as before

Banning:
controltheweak@uswest for solo sending: 3 days
themeasurer@eurobattlenet, hate_stupids@useast for not kicking obvious game ruiner: 2 days