ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 655376.w3g or https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9655376[*]
Game Name: [ENT] LoD -sds6bod2fn #55
Your Warcraft III Username: n00bs,com
Violator's Warcraft III Username: mau5 and kopele
Violated Rule(s): MH.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Through hole game, they knew my location in their or my woods, to a pinpoint of 10-15 secs of me being there, without wards. The only wards they had was at the wards they had from the start of the game. There is two examples of me dieng before 15 mins, but the first clear is around 15 mins. Mau5 he is in the forrest, he is on the way towards the middle of the map after clearing two camps, but suddently changes, for no reason without vision, cutting the trees and clickign on my location. At 18:20, yes Kopele saw me TP top, and assume I go woods, but how does he know at what camp and how does he know that I walked towards tower? He dives me from fog of war without wards in entire woods. At around 20 mins I TP top again, I did not show on map, when I teleported, yet Mau5 runs straight to the tower, without vision, I even try to hide in the woods, but i can't get through and he kills me. That's just following me, idk about the other players.
Any further thoughts:

Simple wood ganks, Blur mechanics from mau5, and prior vision ganks. This is arguably not mh.

"Prior vision ganks" what kind of made up shit is that? You chased me to a specific location from fog of war several times.

That's called "ganking woods". And i'm referring to tower dives.

Why would you argue as much in this thread and in the game if you are innocent, the more you type the more you confirm you trying to hide your MH.

n00bs wrote:Why would you argue as much in this thread and in the game if you are innocent, the more you type the more you confirm you trying to hide your MH.

whether he "argues"/explains or not won't affect mod's review process or decision

@n00bs

Please provide more time stamps. 2 time stamps is not enough, especially when 1 of them you admit that they saw you teleport.

I died 10 times, I went through the video once, that's what I found, exactly why should I bother coming with more timestamps when you won't look through it anyway? If you see the pathing of those two clips it's enough, the fog of war chases under towers without teleports confirms it. My time is just as valueable as you'rs. I provided the information, clearly my opinion is not valueable anyway, you can make the ban, not me.

n00bs wrote:Why would you argue as much in this thread and in the game if you are innocent, the more you type the more you confirm you trying to hide your MH.

Alright. So I'm calling you a map hacker. If you deny it, it means that my assertion is proven. This is how your logic works.

I posted two time stamps - Go check, if you disagree, please tell me, because then you know something I don't.
Expect only a moron would call me a mh'er, I suck. Why deny that when you got no proof?

As I said, we need more than 2 time stamps. If you want to provide more time stamps (You pretty much have 1 time stamp as you already said 1 is not suspicious) I will be more than happy to go through them.

n00bs wrote:Why would you argue as much in this thread and in the game if you are innocent, the more you type the more you confirm you trying to hide your MH.

Buddy, I clearly said you'd make a fool out of yourself if you tried to ban me and that i'll be waiting.
(23:10 / All) Mau5: you'll make a fool out of yourself id rather u not
(26:55 / All) Mau5: i'd like to see u in forums
(26:58 / All) Mau5: make a fool out of yourself
(27:23 / All) Mau5: i'll be waiting!
So really this is just me being indulged by your false theory.

All of you argue against me without actually checking the map and the given timestamps. I won't reply futhermore, if you just argue against me, without actually looking in my interest, only looking against.

You took 5 statements out of context, excluding the flaming.

(21:53 / All) Mau5: its called map awareness
(21:55 / All) Mau5: go get some noob

(33:43 / All) Mau5: lol buddy almost all your requests got denied
(33:44 / All) Mau5: good luck

He went checked my games either to flame or just because his fear was enhanced.

I'm concerned about your definition of arguing/flame. I'm just explaining to you what you keep thinking is "mh".

n00bs wrote:You took 5 statements out of context, excluding the flaming.

(21:53 / All) Mau5: its called map awareness
(21:55 / All) Mau5: go get some noob

(33:43 / All) Mau5: lol buddy almost all your requests got denied
(33:44 / All) Mau5: good luck

He went checked my games either to flame or just because his fear was enhanced.

No I checked your ENT account dying to know who you were by this statment

(27:29 / All) n00bs.com: lol
(27:33 / All) n00bs.com: he deosnt know me
(27:38 / All) n00bs.com: he's a shit cunt hacker
(27:43 / All) n00bs.com: who eneds to cheat to win czo he sucks

Is calling someone a noob really worse than a shit cunt?

Also if your not going to reply than I guess this topic is over? The staff member did ask you for 2 more time stamps.