Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9659425
Game Name: [ENT] HELLHALT TD #79
Your Warcraft III Username: Dreadfoul
Violator's Warcraft III Username: tappi
Violated Rule(s): Refusing to play with the team
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 31m
Any further thoughts: He has refused to send with the team multiple times and contines to be an issue within the HELLHALT community.
tappi@europe.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
tappi@europe.battle.net
- These users thanked the author dreadfoul for the post:
- Mysteriousdewd (Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:24 pm)
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:52 am
- Has thanked: 3 times
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
This guy was pretty cancerous to the enemy team. As someone on the other team I felt bad for their frustration. This kind of obstinate behavior should not be tolerated.
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
(31:19 / Allied) tappi: 17
(31:23 / Allied) tappi: not 16
(31:34 / Allied) dreadfoul: look at blue
(31:35 / Allied) tappi: or they will have time for di dd
(31:45 / Allied) tappi: and so
(32:02 / Allied) dreadfoul: he will gold 17
(32:05 / Allied) dreadfoul: hold
(32:14 / Allied) tappi: mb yes
(32:16 / Allied) tappi: and?
(32:27 / Allied) rancid1290: im with oj
(32:40 / Allied) tappi: with way to lose
(33:06 / Allied) tappi: i told u if we will do that we lose 100%
(33:30 / Allied) tappi: oj u listen only urself dude
(33:40 / Allied) tappi: open ur mind
(33:47 / Allied) rancid1290: and its the better play
(34:03 / All) rancid1290: rappi isnt all about that ganj
(34:35 / Allied) tappi: !ignore ran
(34:48 / All) rancid1290: green wont agree that weed will cure my autism
(34:57 / Allied) dreadfoul: fine will play by your rules kid then we can just report you for not playing with the team after
--
is it multiple times oj?did I send alone 1 time oj??open ur mind again.
(31:23 / Allied) tappi: not 16
(31:34 / Allied) dreadfoul: look at blue
(31:35 / Allied) tappi: or they will have time for di dd
(31:45 / Allied) tappi: and so
(32:02 / Allied) dreadfoul: he will gold 17
(32:05 / Allied) dreadfoul: hold
(32:14 / Allied) tappi: mb yes
(32:16 / Allied) tappi: and?
(32:27 / Allied) rancid1290: im with oj
(32:40 / Allied) tappi: with way to lose
(33:06 / Allied) tappi: i told u if we will do that we lose 100%
(33:30 / Allied) tappi: oj u listen only urself dude
(33:40 / Allied) tappi: open ur mind
(33:47 / Allied) rancid1290: and its the better play
(34:03 / All) rancid1290: rappi isnt all about that ganj
(34:35 / Allied) tappi: !ignore ran
(34:48 / All) rancid1290: green wont agree that weed will cure my autism
(34:57 / Allied) dreadfoul: fine will play by your rules kid then we can just report you for not playing with the team after
--
is it multiple times oj?did I send alone 1 time oj??open ur mind again.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:52 am
- Has thanked: 3 times
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
The rules state that you must follow the MAJORITY of the team, and since 2/3 people agreed to 16 and you chose to be unco-operative that is team killing by entgaming.net's standards and rules.
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
and,for example,if u want to send on the 9th lvl I too should repeat this for u??do not get nonsense.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
@Pasheka
If you do not follow the team, the MAJORITY, as Mysteriousdewd stated, it is a bannable offense, regardless of if you think yours is the right play or not.
If you do not follow the team, the MAJORITY, as Mysteriousdewd stated, it is a bannable offense, regardless of if you think yours is the right play or not.
- These users thanked the author pr0totype for the post:
- Mysteriousdewd (Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:24 pm)
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
dude u want to say that if I and my friend in one team with u agree to send each lvl and ignore up the king u must follow us???and if u do not do this then u break the rulez??well,then u have to ban all the players in the game...we only argued the 16th and 17th lvls..and nothing terrible happened there..but on the 20th we lost..these two must be angry with themselves and not with me and next time its better to build in the 20th lv.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
There is a difference between what he did and what you are saying. What you said is essentially trolling and throwing as upping the king is almost a mandatory portion of the game for survival, whereas his could potentially have them lose heals, etc. What you are suggesting is game ruining.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
I know there is a language barrier, but that is not what I said at all.
1. There is a difference between what he did and what you are saying.
2. What you are saying - send every round and ignore upping the king totally - This is throwing in two ways: Feeding and refusing to up the king essentially marks it so you will lose. There is almost no guarantee the other team will not benefit from this type of play, thus, it's throwing. Not an example that can be used.
3. What HE did is teamplay with the other team member to send on a level that would make sense and they could potentially lose heals. These are the kinds of calls that you must follow, regardless of if you think it is the right call.
4. What you are suggesting in your example of sending every round and not up king is game ruining.
1. There is a difference between what he did and what you are saying.
2. What you are saying - send every round and ignore upping the king totally - This is throwing in two ways: Feeding and refusing to up the king essentially marks it so you will lose. There is almost no guarantee the other team will not benefit from this type of play, thus, it's throwing. Not an example that can be used.
3. What HE did is teamplay with the other team member to send on a level that would make sense and they could potentially lose heals. These are the kinds of calls that you must follow, regardless of if you think it is the right call.
4. What you are suggesting in your example of sending every round and not up king is game ruining.
- Hutzu
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 4117
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:48 pm
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: tappi@europe.battle.net
@dreadfoul
That's not how it works. If you had sent on 16 and he didn't follow, sure that's a ban. But he didn't say he wont send 16 or anything like it. Just that he is sure it would fail. Denied.
@pasheka basically if the majority wants to send every round, and they are not trolling (just new players or from other bots where they enjoy lvl 31+ games), then yeah, you would need to send with them or get banned if reported. Though the likelihood of that happening is rather slim. I dunno how often I had to follow silly/team-killing calls in the past and lose, but as this is a team-game you have to take both sides of the coin.
(34:57 / Allied) dreadfoul: fine will play by your rules kid then we can just report you for not playing with the team after
That's not how it works. If you had sent on 16 and he didn't follow, sure that's a ban. But he didn't say he wont send 16 or anything like it. Just that he is sure it would fail. Denied.
@pasheka basically if the majority wants to send every round, and they are not trolling (just new players or from other bots where they enjoy lvl 31+ games), then yeah, you would need to send with them or get banned if reported. Though the likelihood of that happening is rather slim. I dunno how often I had to follow silly/team-killing calls in the past and lose, but as this is a team-game you have to take both sides of the coin.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests