Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 786632.w3g
Game Name: [ent] hellhalt td #46
Your Warcraft III Username: LYNX_IYNX
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Trinion@aia.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): intentional feeding round 9 (used up all timber), tried to waste heal on 10, using rage in lvl 17 on imminent loose against team.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): rnd 2, 9, 10, ... 17 (20:50)....
Any further thoughts: Please ban!
sovereign@uswest.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
sovereign@uswest.battle.net
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 786632.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Hellhalt TD #46
Your Warcraft III Username: LYNX_IYNX
Violator's Warcraft III Username: sovereign.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): using multiple accounts, intentionally feeding and loosing
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): rnd 2, 9, 10, 17 (20:50)
Any further thoughts: i noticed this german user many times using different alias over the last weeks whilst playing with multiple accounts - always intentionally feeding and loosing for one or the other side. Also a trash talker i request ip range ban here. Thank you!
(27:43 / Allied) LYNX_IYNX: red why u didnt juice ur mutants for this rnd?
...
(28:00 / Allied) Trinion: why didnt ur mom juice for this round
Game Name: [ENT] Hellhalt TD #46
Your Warcraft III Username: LYNX_IYNX
Violator's Warcraft III Username: sovereign.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): using multiple accounts, intentionally feeding and loosing
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): rnd 2, 9, 10, 17 (20:50)
Any further thoughts: i noticed this german user many times using different alias over the last weeks whilst playing with multiple accounts - always intentionally feeding and loosing for one or the other side. Also a trash talker i request ip range ban here. Thank you!
(27:43 / Allied) LYNX_IYNX: red why u didnt juice ur mutants for this rnd?
...
(28:00 / Allied) Trinion: why didnt ur mom juice for this round
-
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 5134
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:56 am
- Location: Canada
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: sovereign@uswest.battle.net
Merging topics for same game.
This will allow the Staff member who reviews this to deal with both reports at the same time.
This will allow the Staff member who reviews this to deal with both reports at the same time.
-
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 5134
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:56 am
- Location: Canada
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: sovereign@uswest.battle.net
Trinion@Asia.battle.net
Solo Sending
Player sovereign@USWest.battle.net banned 2 days for solo sending after being told not to solo send.
I did not see evidence of the user attempting to force a heal on 10, used immo and targeted sent units.
Sovereign@USWest.battle.net
Request to ban Sovereign@USWest.battle.net denied as he communicated sends with team mate, and there was no evidence of feeding.
Processing.
Solo Sending
Code: Select all
Round 2 - minor
3:36 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
Round 9 - Force sent on 9 and was told after round 2 not to solo send. Did not communicate send.
19:21 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Centurion] (flags: 0x0040)
19:25 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
19:25 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
19:25 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
19:25 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
19:42 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
19:42 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
19:42 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
19:42 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
20:09 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
20:09 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
20:09 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
20:09 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Militia] (flags: 0x0040)
20:11 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Furbolg] (flags: 0x0040)
20:11 <Trinion> 0x10: Immediate order: [Furbolg] (flags: 0x0040)
Player sovereign@USWest.battle.net banned 2 days for solo sending after being told not to solo send.
I did not see evidence of the user attempting to force a heal on 10, used immo and targeted sent units.
Sovereign@USWest.battle.net
Request to ban Sovereign@USWest.battle.net denied as he communicated sends with team mate, and there was no evidence of feeding.
Processing.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 103 guests