Page 1 of 1

[LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 6:12 pm
by Slomosapien
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 822169.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #10
Your Warcraft III Username: SlomoSapien
Violator's Warcraft III Username: junnker99@entconnect
Violated Rule(s): possible MH
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts:
(12:09 / Allied) junnker99: I HAVE MH ENEMY NO SEND

I know saying you have mh is not enough, but he/she called their sends everytime

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 9:26 am
by Zeratul
After reviewing:

[*] They saw harlot on 3 (which got fed), on 5 ur team leaked again and they saw pink with 2 lods + locks and harlot mid again, getting more feed -> So sending on 8 was their best choice, since harlot was gonna hold 7 (and judging on the harlot, sending 8 was the logical send)

[*]On 6, u saw their units (2 upped dragons) and still leaked to king - You had a fed harlot holder -> reasonable to expect they won't send (they had immo, but slow pushes due to spawns, so it was clear they were skipping 7 due to you having a harlot holder + possible LoD mid, and that send on 7 would do nothing to your team)

[*]And once you saw they had immo without upping much the king, it became clear they were sending on 8 (due to harlot)

[*]On 10, you only got a ghoul each + they never upped king (they burned heals) -> they skipped 10, and judging by your units, a 12 send was obvious (harlots, aqua + harlot and wolverines - even pink wasn't that strong either to sustain a hold for 12)

[*]When you send 12, ballistas + commanders are expected (and you can somehow guess the amount of it, if you count the time that it takes inbetween each one)

So altho he said he had mh (sounding stupid), nope - it's explainable by your units, their units, leaks, push/heals, etc. (No fogclicks found either, altho had he fogclicked, the map itself would have mentioned it - and none of the players ingame streams either - at least that im aware of)

EDIT: Theres another maphack report on this user viewtopic.php?f=8&t=118800

[LTD] junnker99@entconnect MAPHACK

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 10:21 pm
by legionlikeaboss
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 872570.w3g
Game Name: [ent] legion td mega #18
Your Warcraft III Username: td_pro
Violator's Warcraft III Username: junnker99@entconnect
Violated Rule(s): maphack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 4:14
Any further thoughts:
(04:14 / All) junnker99: really yellow hermit :?
He says this right as i misclick on herm, before anyone can see.

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect MAPHACK

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 10:26 pm
by legionlikeaboss
The next game he was on my team...more evidence below:
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 872719.w3g
(04:01 / Allied) junnker99: send 3 enemy
(07:38 / Allied) junnker99: enemy ea cross and demon
(12:29 / Allied) junnker99: enemy send 7 !

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect MAPHACK

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:27 pm
by Zeratul
After reviewing:

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 872570.w3g

Code: Select all

4:14 [All] junnker99: really yellow hermit :?


This is called before round begins - and seems too accurate to be a "coincidence"

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 872719.w3g

Code: Select all

(04:01 / Allied) junnker99: send 3 enemy
(04:17 / Allied) junnker99: go val for 3


They had sent on 1, so it's reasonable to expect a send on 3 (but tbh, his chat looks more like an affirmation, than a possibility)

Code: Select all

(07:38 / Allied) junnker99: enemy ea cross and demon


Well the demon is LoD - they saw it on 1 when your team leaked - and judging by your leaks from 1 (and overall killing speed), it was possible to know there was a cross and ea, but still would require extreme focusing on enemy killing time (which i dont think is the case here, judging by all of the evidence)

Code: Select all

(12:29 / Allied) junnker99: enemy send 7 !


Possible to expect, but again, looking at possibilities - your team could have went king instead of having oj holding 7

Adding these current events, with the previous reported viewtopic.php?f=8&t=118059&p=459785&hilit=junnker99#p459785 (The previous brq now makes a lot more sense)

I'm pretty sure hes maphacking (that hermit call with no sight at all, seconds after being sent, is just shady lol), and should be banned for it

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:11 am
by legionlikeaboss
Another MH accusation. Not coincidence.

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 4:47 am
by broud3r
Junnker99 banned 1 year for maphacking.

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:58 am
by Zeratul
@Broud3r looking at the replays attached, im pretty sure u noticed this too viewtopic.php?f=8&t=118800 :P You can process that 2nd one too (or merge with this one, for more evidence i guess) ^^ Thanks