ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9865771
Game Name: [ent] dota arem us/ca #60
Your Warcraft III Username: Psycopath
Violator's Warcraft III Username: xxinvokerxx
Violated Rule(s): maphack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): all through out game
Any further thoughts: always at the right place at the right time. please look into possible hack. thank you.

Hey @Methylone

For future reference, you must post time(s) of violation(s) in order for your ban requests to be reviewed.

I still decided to look through this anyway. After my review I didn't find anything really suspicious. Maybe the odd moment where it may have looked suspicious but I did not bother to second check, simply because the rest of the game his plays looked pretty upright. As of now I think this is a false accusation.

If you believe I am wrong and/or do have time stamps you come up with, please post them so that I or someone else can review it again for a good old double check.

Regards,
RedMercedes

Sorry I'm not too familiar with all the accessories needed. All i can tell you is that every time i would charge someone he would teleport to them. Once i called him out on it he stopped. I can't really tell you the time stamps because i didn't stamp any but if you can tell me how to look them up i can provide them for you. Thank you.

Time stamps of map hack:
20:18
24:13
29:21
And by 32:35 he stopped because i had told him i was gonna report. But pretty much all through out the game he always at the right place at the right time which is impossible without hack. if you cant see this then i dont think you guys take this map hacking serious and anyone can get away with it which means that i can hack and it will be okay because you dont take action. this doesnt make the game fun knowing people hack and you admins dont do anytihng about it.

After reviewing:

[*]At 8 mins, pudge is coming top, you charged, passing next to him - which allowed him to know u were coming top -> Pudge changes direction (and instead of going to the ramp at scourge woods), he goes towards the top tower, finds you and kills you
[*]At 11 mins - you can see butcher went after gondar when you were already charging -> he woulnd't have followed gondar had he known you were coming, for sure
[*]At 12 mins - your team engaged botlane (before you arrived), so it was obvious to assume you were coming bot -> butcher tp's bot only after scourge engaged
[*]At 16 mins - you're running towards top from his team, butcher tp's top and hooks you -> nothing wrong here either
[*]At 18 mins - he used his inv rune and he saw brown going bot, however at the same time u started charging, pink is seen returning mid (indicating a possible gank - and with a bara on the team, its more than reasonable) -> butcher actually goes for the tinker/pink who was coming, completely neglecting you (bara)
[*]At 20 mins - butcher got haste rune, no1 from scourge was on sight, and sentinel is pushing mid ... where else would your team be lols
[*]At 22 mins - butcher warded ur forest, and ganked u
[*]At 24 mins - your forest was warded, they could see u charging top ... lol
[*]at 28.30 mins - you're seen charging fletcher botlane (due to the wards in your forest)

Stopping here as i've covered your timestamps (and others not mentioned) - Not a single suspicious action (which makes me wonder if you truly rewatched this, or you just tossed the chatlog stamps where you called him out - cause else you'd easily realize how he knew where you were going in the mentioned timestamps)

This should be denied, there's no evidence of maphack

PS:

if you cant see this then i dont think you guys take this map hacking serious and anyone can get away with it which means that i can hack and it will be okay because you dont take action. this doesnt make the game fun knowing people hack and you admins dont do anytihng about it.

Tossing random threats won't make your report more "believe-able"; Also ain't hard to prove someone is maphacking, when you know what you're doing/looking for, so i woulnd't try my luck there.

Agree with above review. No evidence for mh here.
Denied.