[LTD] trunka_razuma@server.eurobattle.net

[Indrial]

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9886976
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #60
Your Warcraft III Username: Madao-chan
Violator's Warcraft III Username: trunka_razuma, l0_1o_lo_1o0@europe.battle.net, konopa@europe.battle.net
Violated Rule(s):
You are obligated to !votekick any player that has broken any of ENT's rules. If someone or several indicate that a particular player is game ruining, you, as a player in the game, are obligated to question/check about the situation/claim.
If a votekick is initiated to kick a visible game ruiner, all players are obligated to !yes.

Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Begining of the game - till the afker has left - after 3 min...
Any further thoughts:

They were warned quite clearly they are breaking the rules, didnt give a damn tho.

(01:22 / Allied) Madao-chan: !votekick panda
(01:22 / All) BBD: A votekick against player [Pandayolo1] has been started by player [Madao-chan]. 5 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.

(01:25 / All) Madao-chan: afker.
(01:28 / All) Madao-chan: kick him pls.
(01:34 / All) Madao-chan: dude, you will be banned for it..
(01:40 / All) Madao-chan: you have to vote
(01:40 / All) Trunka_razuma: i dont care
(01:42 / All) Madao-chan: due to rules
(01:44 / All) Madao-chan: ok.
(01:51 / All) l0_1O_lo_1o0: play
(03:35 / All) Trunka_razuma: u can ff always

Surely they will get some hour ban, instead of making them banned until they read the rules

[Zeratul]

I still havent figured out, after doing this for so long, why people report the nonvoters, but never the person who caused the votekick to be started, in the first place (afk, gameruin, etc.) ... amazes me really lol

After reviewing:

AFK:

Blue was afk the entire time (from start till leaves at 3 minutes - no DRM selections either)

Votekicks:

Spoiler!

(01:22 / All) BBD: A votekick against player [Pandayolo1] has been started by player [Madao-chan]. 5 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
(01:25 / All) Madao-chan: afker.
(01:28 / All) Madao-chan: kick him pls.
(01:28 / All) BBD: Player [fullsend] voted to kick player [Pandayolo1]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.
(01:28 / All) Madao-chan: you cant see it through !afk since it works after 3 min of afking
(01:28 / All) BBD: Player [BBD] voted to kick player [Pandayolo1]. 3 more votes are needed to pass.
(01:28 / All) BBD: Player [Zorlel1] voted to kick player [Pandayolo1]. 2 more votes are needed to pass.
(01:34 / All) Madao-chan: dude, you will be banned for it..
(01:40 / All) Madao-chan: you have to vote
(01:40 / All) Trunka_razuma: i dont care
(01:42 / All) Madao-chan: due to rules
(01:44 / All) Madao-chan: ok.
(01:54 / All) BBD: A votekick against player [Pandayolo1] has expired.

True the votekick is started before round 1 starts so they cant see him leaking mid, but a simple "Blue are you there?" could have solved/confirm the afk ( and his 3 allies voted him + gave a reason to votekick him)

So:

pandayolo1@europe.battle.net should be banned for afk
l0_1o_lo_1o0@europe.battle.net , trunka_razuma@server.eurobattle.net and konopa@europe.battle.net should be warned/short ban for refusing to kick (the afk left at 3 minutes, and only 1 votekick started - so i woulnd't go hard on them tbh)

[Indrial]

Well the issue is propably in your head, since he was reported right before this br was even made.

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=118965&p=464896&hilit=pandayolo1#p464896

Better wont comment the judgement - banned for 2 days for leaving and got an warning for afking .-Ddddddddddd


btw how can't you go hard on them? They clearly have totally no clue there are any rules. Isnt it wrong?

[Zeratul]

So instead of making a single report with the afker and the nonvoters, you even make it worst, by making 2 brqs separately, spamming more brqs when the list is already extensive ... good job 'lol'

And regarding the votekick .. Well only 1 votekick was initiated, and he left shortly after - so no major impact (ergo why a warning/small ban is enough imo)

[Indrial]

Because they werent even aware they are doing anything against the rules - ergo nothing will stop them to keep doing it in the future since it wont have any negative impact on them. How will they know they have a warning if they havent visited this forum just for a single once? Or what will small ban do if they wont try to play within this ''small'' bans duration?


Btw wondering how many votekick attempts do you want to make within 3 min. 1vk lasts +- 60-90s and then the initiator has a cooldown another 60-90s.

[Arcanium]

Was afk until he left. Only one round's worth of leakage and it was free gold for red. No big impact on the game, but they still refused to vote.

(01:22 / Allied) Madao-chan: !votekick panda
(01:28 / Allied) fullsend: !yes
(01:28 / Allied) BBD: !yes
(01:28 / Allied) Zorlel1: !yes

(01:40 / All) Madao-chan: you have to vote
(01:40 / All) Trunka_razuma: i dont care
(01:42 / All) Madao-chan: due to rules
(01:44 / All) Madao-chan: ok.
(01:51 / All) l0_1O_lo_1o0: play

Trunka_razuma and l0_1O_lo_1o0 banned 1 day as a warning for refusing to vote.

Processing.