Page 1 of 1

Pika uswest.battle.net

Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:57 pm
by Marelzo
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 936933.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] HELLHALT TD #88
Your Warcraft III Username: Tommy uswest.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Pika uswest.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Claim yellow was afk when in fact he told him to rr and build peewee, then yellow missed time to build them and try kick him. He threat me to report it. He said he didnt build, then he said he build 150 value then said again he didn't build.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 01:01 to 01:25 to prove he wasn't afk, 01:31 when he try ban him, 01:28, 01:40 and 02:05 saying different reason to ban him, 03:10 claim hewould report me to not accept his ilegal ban request, 04:09 claim he would ban me
Any further thoughts: Lame behavior from him, once again

Re: Pika uswest.battle.net

Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:22 pm
by Pikachu_
lol. our teammate built too late on level 1 and had zero bounty on over half the wave leak. but also you were watching my stream and cheating during this game. so that's cool

Re: Pika uswest.battle.net

Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:27 pm
by Pikachu_
and I broke zero rules this game. good post though glad you posted about the game you were stream sniping in

Re: Pika uswest.battle.net

Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:46 pm
by peeweegunz
As someone who happend to spectate this game, i would decline your brq.

Please don't lie in your brq.
Pika never said yellow was afk, he said he didn't build, which is true.

(02:05 / All) Pika: hes not afk he just didnt build

Yellow had all the time in the world to build up peewees, but he was so damn slow that he only got to make 150 value. He legit build 1 peewee every 3 secons, which was frustrating to watch as the timer was going down.

(01:01 / Allied) Pika: -rolls
(01:03 / Allied) Pika: nice
(01:04 / Allied) Pika: peewee
(01:05 / Allied) Pika: quick
(01:13 / Allied) Pika: \build man
(01:16 / Allied) Pika: mass peewee
(01:21 / Allied) Pika: upgrade
(01:21 / Allied) Pika: quick
(01:23 / Allied) Pika: you out of time
(01:25 / Allied) Pika: .....

so in 25 seconds, yellow managed to build 10 peewees.



Kicking someone for not building 1 and leaking almost full wave worth 0 bounty seems pretty TK to me, as such i would say the vote to kick is justified.

Seems to me that you are just mad that you lost, nothing more to it.

Re: Pika uswest.battle.net

Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 8:10 pm
by Pikachu_
The use of any utility (FCD, maphack, stream sniping, etc.) that gives you an unfair advantage over other players will result in a heavy ban.

So Tommy, when you left my stream after another viewer called you out halfway through this game, would that fall against this rule? Since you seem to be so quick to try and abuse the rule system when I did in fact never tell you he was afk when that's what you are trying to say I did.

Re: Pika uswest.battle.net

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 4:08 am
by Arcanium
(00:37 / Allied) Pika: -rolls
(00:46 / Allied) Pika: might wanna rr that yellow :P
(01:01 / Allied) Pika: -rolls
(01:03 / Allied) Pika: nice
(01:04 / Allied) Pika: peewee
(01:05 / Allied) Pika: quick
(01:13 / Allied) Pika: \build man
(01:16 / Allied) Pika: mass peewee
(01:21 / Allied) Pika: upgrade
(01:21 / Allied) Pika: quick
(01:23 / Allied) Pika: you out of time
(01:25 / Allied) Pika: .....
(01:28 / All) Pika: yellow didnt build
(01:31 / Allied) Pika: !votekick freddy
(01:40 / All) Pika: 150 value


Nothing here that pika said about afk. No rules broken so this ban request in invalid thus denied.

Processing.