ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/customstats/legio ... /10693986/
Game Name: [ent] legion td mega #53
Your Warcraft III Username: amizoo
Violator's Warcraft III Username: LionuK
Violated Rule(s): Vote kick abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): On lvl 9
Any further thoughts:

Moreover, LionuK himself and other team members refused to kick a solo sender in my team, even after it was explained solo sending is violating ENT rules. Funny thing is that Lionuk said "it is auto send mode" when I tried to kick out the solo sender but it was not. And Lionuk abused votekick when I mentioned refusing to kick out solo sender is also banable.

Recently, ENT games are ruined by a number of newbies who do not respect the ent rules. Please, ban LionuK to let him understand the ent rules.

Why should new players get a ban right away for a mistake? That would just scare them away. I also noticed that you and LionuK were beeing toxic towards eachother and other teammates which creates a negative experience for the others. You also happened to threaten alot with lines where you mention ban/banned alot. LionuK did not participate in the vote against the solo sender which is a violation of the rules, but neither did the rest except pink. LionuK should be banned for the way you got kicked. There were no grounds as to why you should`ve been kicked.

-Do not flame, rage, troll, or insult other players excessively.
-Do not deceive players about rules in an attempt to get them banned/to force them to do something they are not obligated to. For example, telling users to draw or they would get banned is deceiving as drawing is a mere vote and not mandatory.

@Amizoo Next time dont spam "noob" when you dont like what others are building. The LTD mega bot is a bot where new players can learn how to play. Even tho he was solo sending, you never told him to not solo send.

Also you knew, or should have known he was a new player when he joined the lobby:

Back to the BRQ (Only reviewed to lvl 10):
Lionuk isnt a new player, he has over 400 games at LTD Hell so he should know the rules aswell. He also show in his LTD Hell games that he can save with the team, so in this game he was just trolling on purpose pre 10.
Lionuk:
Solo sends a hermit lvl 1 (Tho purple suddenly sent a hermit aswell which may be because he is a LTD Hell player and not a mega player - also both did it without talking)
1st warning by blue:

Solo sends a furbolg lvl 5 without communication.
2nd warning by teal:


frankcastl3:
Solo sends bowmen for lvl 4
Solo sends bloodorc for lvl 6
Solo sends whelp for lvl 8 (Tho pink sends a dino and yellow sends 2x Ghoul before the round starts so 75% of the team sent)

1st votekick: Against Frankcast

It was based on orange solo sending two times. Orange was a new player and his team didnt bother telling him that he shouldnt send solo.
Because of lack of communication/warnings from the team and that its based on two solo sends i would considere this an invalid votekick.

2nd votekick: Against Amizoo


It seems that Lionuk (from the other team) started the votekick as a revenge because amizoo started one against Frankcast, and threaten them with a ban (from a brq). Also it is based on amizoo solo sending 1 time "(16:47 / All) LionuK: kick green solo send", but pink sent with him so it wasnt a solo send. Those in blue color might have voted because Amizoo was breaking this rule: Do not flame, rage, troll, or insult other players excessively

Here is all the times Amizoo called Frankcast (Orange) a noob based on his build and based on him solo sending twice.


So the 2nd votekick can be considered an abusive votekick from west point of view because they did it as a revenge on Amizoo, but the votes from the east side can be considered legitimate because amizoo was "insulting excessively".

So to sum it up:

The rule is against multiple solo sends after being warned not to. He was not warned you just repeatedly called him a noob.

Denied.