Hoebell wrote:@SnowwyWolf
u have to check replay not only chat.. it was clear not lvl 17 game after no leak 11-17 and 2300 woods from them.. we talked about go 17.. but no leak obvs we / they cant 17
And ye we talked 15 mins b4 he sent solo about send 17 or not
I did, I watched the entire replay and you already told a blatant lie in your opening post, you said no one mentioned anything about sending on 17 and yet you all said to send on 17 and agreed. If you feel like something changed in the game after you said to send on 17, you need to make that clear and say it in chat. If I was playing with a team and they all said "Send 17" and it was agreed on, if no one said anything else after that, which none of you did. I would send on 17, otherwise, it would be seen as refusing to team play.
For me this is very simple :
1) You said to send on 17.
2) Your team agreed to send on 17.
3) Nothing else was said and he sent on 17.
He did literally what the team wanted and now you want to try to lie about him to get him punished? Why were you not honest in your post? You lied to try to get him banned, evidently.
As I said, if this was my decision I cannot see any way a ban would be justified if you all said to send on 17, NOTHING else was said after that to the contrary and so he sent on 17.
If I am missing something here, where you said in chat to not send on 17, please do let me know because I cannot see it anywhere. Teams do calls to send on certain levels which are bad all the time but the point is you go with what the team decides, the only thing I have seen was you decide was to send on 17, he did that.
Also you did not speak 15 minutes prior about sending on 17, it was 9 minutes prior, yes that is a big difference.
