[LTD] holymoly force send refused to team play excessive ping

[Viserion]

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 766973.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #87
Your Warcraft III Username: Viserion
Violator's Warcraft III Username: holymoly
Violated Rule(s): forced send lvl 3, excessive ping whole game all 3 lanes, refuse to cooperate
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 3:44, excessive ping whole game more or less in 18 min red said:(18:37 / Allied) takeonme: i wish he stopped that
Any further thoughts: well, like panda said i ignored him for a good reason. he is the most ignored player in the community for a good reason. (07:40 / All) bored.panda: well in terms of how u talked about viserion last game where he wasnt even part
(07:44 / All) bored.panda: I can imagine why u gettin ignored.
In lvl 1 he just ignored emi1 who said nothing to him after red and me ignored him cause he allready started trash talk right from the start
(00:33 / Allied) holymoly: we auto lose
(00:35 / Allied) holymoly: haha
(00:38 / Allied) holymoly: fun
so no communication possible any longer. Than he forced lvl 3 send just so we cant 7 anymore really and did king. The fact that he ignored emi1 for no reason secured that teamplay is no longer possible. He dont needs to ignore him:
(04:15 / All) dead: ?
(04:16 / All) Viserion: he forced
(04:19 / All) holymoly: i each other
(04:20 / All) dead: how
(04:24 / All) bored.panda: u ignored emil
(04:25 / All) bored.panda: why u did
(04:25 / All) holymoly: so dont coummuncate
(04:27 / All) dead: what's reson?
(04:32 / All) holymoly: donno?
(04:33 / All) Emi1: i said nothing to him
(04:40 / All) Viserion: he said nothing
(04:43 / All) holymoly: cz blue
(04:43 / All) bored.panda: tell us the reason u ignored emil

[Augustinus]

First time I see em1l ignored ever.

[bigtits]

holymoly is most toxic player i ever saw i think this is one of the only player more toxic than me XD , and also very very tk

[SnowwyWolf]

Reviewing now.

User banned 3 days for solo-send.

I cannot comment on his tenure here and him being the most ignored player but the fact that one player on your team didn't ignore him allowed for a channel of communication. The fact that he ignored the only person to discuss strategy with in order to force sends and retaliate by trying to force sends means a ban is warranted.

- User has priors.
- Solo-sent level 3.

How a ban could have been avoided:
- Not ignoring emil to discuss strategy and what the team has voted for.
- Following the teams sends instead of forcing your own.

In future, though It would be nice to have some kind of evidence has to why you default to ignoring this user, makes my job a little bit easier in judging the case is all.