ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/replay.php?id=11797108
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #61
Your Warcraft III Username: sweatheart
Violator's Warcraft III Username: runescape2007
Violated Rule(s): exesessive flame/insults
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 9:47
Any further thoughts:

Moron

sweatheart is the argument for re-enabling votekick in lobby

games feel like 3v5 with him in the team, not necessarily because of bad play but because he is so often against anything that could remotely be considered teamwork from the outset.

epicdeath wrote:sweatheart is the argument for re-enabling votekick in lobby

games feel like 3v5 with him in the team, not necessarily because of bad play but because he is so often against anything that could remotely be considered teamwork from the outset.

+1

SO youre telling me im against my teams well being? Consider we scout ygg with grey and they did force a 5 send. Ofcourse the outcome was obvious. 30 leaks mid ygg held like 20. YES OFCOURSE I WILL BE AGAINST SUCH A STUPID SEND!

epicdeath wrote:sweatheart is the argument for re-enabling votekick in lobby

games feel like 3v5 with him in the team, not necessarily because of bad play but because he is so often against anything that could remotely be considered teamwork from the outset.

So what i understand about your comment is that first u didnt watch the replay, 2nd u just are promoting bad teamwork when there are more logical approaches to a game. I keep getting disappointed in you people the community and the moderators. There is obviously a double standart. And again most importantly this post is turning personal which is not the point. The point is 1 player did violate your rules and @epicdeath instead of handling the case, you decide to fuel more drama.

I cant handle this case, i'm only lihl staff. Anyways you report excessive flame I dont need to watch replay just read chatlog



You said 43 things this game, 17 of em are in the spoiler which I think supports my opinion, not gonna reply here again

Dude.. there is no need for argument here

I called full send, he holds back lumber, i ask him why he didnt full send with the rest of team?
he answers: (09:25 / Allied) sweatheart: cuz im smart

So i call him a moron, because quite frankly thats what he is.

now he creates this report because i called him a moron and he wants to change the ration of how much he gets reported vs how much he reports. Just go away

Seriously, mudman helped somebody play his line which was a good advice but he decided against it with was a way worse way to play his roll.Then you hold wood on a send.Some harsh words yes,but imo it was due to game teamplay problems.
Maximum a warning imo, asking for a ban is a serious joke.
Just my 2 cents

I played with sweatheart before und it was just a pain in the ass.

In my opinion mudman should get banned, he is a rly toxic Player after he Flame and insult in game he just continiue in forum. Just watch the chatlog how toxic he is and thats his behaviour in 9 of 10 games. A timeout would help him to respect other ppl on 1200+ bot.

Also i must add here that ppl from lihl just spaming forums to Help each other with nonsense talk. This comments here on this brq are just useless and try to change the focus from the real reason.
I would apologize the admin to handle this brq FAIR.
Mudman insults flame toxic behaviour is just bad for the community.

Pls judge this brq fair, same rights for everybody.

Bordsteinkante wrote:In my opinion mudman should get banned, he is a rly toxic Player after he Flame and insult in game he just continiue in forum. Just watch the chatlog how toxic he is and thats his behaviour in 9 of 10 games. A timeout would help him to respect other ppl on 1200+ bot.

Also i must add here that ppl from lihl just spaming forums to Help each other with nonsense talk. This comments here on this brq are just useless and try to change the focus from the real reason.
I would apologize the admin to handle this brq FAIR.
Mudman insults flame toxic behaviour is just bad for the community.

Pls judge this brq fair, same rights for everybody.

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=143587

Talking about beeing toxic hahaha

He was excessively flaming. Sure i saved 100 lumber mostly so i can push asap aswell as i knew what the outcome of the send will be, especially after i saw the immolation on our team. That was by far the best decision for the team and myself. He should get punished for his behavior because he was flaming and insulting 2 separate players.
(09:47 / Allied) runescape2007: retard
(10:26 / Allied) runescape2007: ur both morons
(11:07 / Allied) runescape2007: fucking moron
(11:16 / Allied) runescape2007: Moron
(11:31 / Allied) runescape2007: pure moron
(12:42 / Allied) runescape2007: ok moron

Count yourselves the amount of times he said moron in 12 minutes. Add up the one moron he used in the comment up. If that is not excessive for him. Maybe u should rethink the way u approach moding. Because if you dont punish such a behavior that means u tolerate toxicness. I do agree that teal did not play that optimal but that not the reason to burst in flame and rage and spit fire to your current teammates.

u guy are the worst @Methodmale

Sorry for saying this but, imo ban every one that flames ( like more than once, first time you got mad) or don't ban anyone and let them use ignore ( and you wind up with mega game) .

this will be my last brq i guess
runescape2007 is banned 2 days for flame
shoud be more normally but lets hope he stop the flames , since this woud be his 4th offence for flame

feel free too appeal mudman