ENT Gaming

Your battle.net username:oxidus
Violator's battle.net username:toomanybears
Game name (if known):[ent] dota arem us/ca #31
Bot name (for example, ENT15):ent38
Approximate date/time of game (alternatively, link to a Stats page):http://s2.clanent.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=808808.w3g
Rule player violated:Maphacking
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer):26min into the game
Any further thoughts:He followed me when i was invis all most all the way to river it wasnt coincidence at all, he knew he could take me on i was really low but i was invis. Most of his movement seems really sketchy at least pudge was carryign wards so it could be the wards or maybe they got wards ont aht spot.

Id hate to say it but this is a really hard one, He never fogclicked at all though the whole game but when he chased you invis was dodgy, What makes it worse is when hes at your mid and and you come in, He trys not to but it shows he knows you are there.

I need someone to watch this aswel, I think he is maphacking but he is very good at hiding it. Ull see at 26:00 that he chase invis for abit but then backs off as he is invis!!!!!

And after that when they are raxing bane is watching as invis ursa comes up and gets nightmare ready for when he comes out of invis. Id say maphack but need a second opinion.

This one is very very sketchy, first of all he constantly DOES MH but then DOES NOT (if that makes sense) I would consider it MH just to be safe, due to the fact that he his actions in game deem him of a MH'er trying to be very careful especially during the chase 26 minutes in.

-GR

Yea id agree, its a hard one to judge, but within 2 instantances he shows it very clearly without fog click or anything, Maybe just a very skilled hacking. For the admins to decide i think.

Need a second admin opinion thanks

honestly you cannot ban a player for just 1 game i'd say deny it for now add him to the and see if comes up again. or check he last few games.

Bubbles Edit: It's supposed to be on the down low, so let's not let everyone know about it.

Denied moving to processed, Not enough evidence