ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 532846.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1100+ #72
Your Warcraft III Username: ifSerendipity
Violator's Warcraft III Username: rocknrolled
Violated Rule(s): Styaing too low values every level and solo send.
b]Time of Violation (in-game or replay):[/b] He satyed way too low values since the beginning of level 3. And, out of nowhere, he started to waste all of his wood upping king. At level 9, he solo sends militia and archers. I gently requested him to stop, he did not listen. After that, he remained not even close to 50% of the recommended value up untill the end, lvl 15.
Any further thoughts:

At the start of the game, I annoucned my teammates I am playing as a holder. This player obviously strated to rage and go 7/0 at level 3. This is absolutely abnormal. His intention to ruin the game did not stop. I wanted to stay positive thinking that he will be at least having very good income in the mid-late game, but he solo sends at level 9. He does not push up his lumber. He leaks every level. To me, this is definitely intentional trolling given his behaviors throughout the entire game. See the chat log below.

05:13 / Allied) rocknrolled: fucking retard
(05:16 / Allied) rocknrolled: holder with chief
(05:19 / Allied) rocknrolled: get a brain
(05:21 / Allied) rocknrolled: stupif fuck
(05:33 / All) rocknrolled: !ff
(05:33 / All) ifSerendipity: [rocknrolled] has voted to forfeit.
(05:33 / All) ifSerendipity: 1/4 players on the Sentinel/West have voted to forfeit (3/4 needed to pass).

(10:53 / Allied) rocknrolled: i just up king
(12:40 / Allied) rocknrolled: !scores

(15:56 / Allied) ifSerendipity: omg
(16:01 / Allied) ifSerendipity: !unignore rock
(16:06 / Allied) ifSerendipity: Can you stop sending solo Red?
(16:07 / Allied) fontenille: hp
(16:09 / Allied) rocknrolled: sup prick?
(16:10 / Allied) fontenille: onlyhp
(16:21 / Allied) ifSerendipity: Oh my god
(16:28 / Allied) ifSerendipity: why are you doing this?
(16:35 / Allied) rocknrolled: now u want teamwork noob?
(16:38 / Allied) rocknrolled: fuck you
(16:39 / Allied) rocknrolled: scrub
(16:48 / Allied) ifSerendipity: Please send as a team
(16:51 / Allied) ifSerendipity: Can you stop?
(16:54 / Allied) rocknrolled: please learn to play this game
(17:04 / Allied) rocknrolled: if u dont like playing in teamwork
(17:07 / Allied) rocknrolled: then fuck u

He makes some attemtps to play this game eventually somehow by doing minimal sending when our team sends, but to me, this just seems sneaky efforts to avoid the ban when he actually gets reported. Simply watch the replay once, and it is very clear that he ruined the game, intentionally, from the beginning.

If I could submit brn for being noob , I would do it this game for the op. Sadly, the op decides to go 1 wisp until level 5 and calls holder with chief. I asked nicely first not to do this but then he flamed and said he will do what he wants. I cannot remember raging this hard in 1100 at 1 wisp holder with chiefs. As everyone knows chiefs are not a reliable holder at all , and overbuilding them is a severe cripple to your income and hence not worth it. so from experience i knew his hold would likely fail and i decided to up king. I had to send one time alone at level 9 because of my fail mortar yolo so for these 2 reasons the op seeks a ban when in fact he should be banned for playing like this in 1100. I remained above 50% value so I dont see why he lied about that.

You hit 7/0 at level 3. And your Value is 285 at level 4. The recommend value is 650. Can you do this simple math? And you wasted all of your wood to king at level 3. Which was not only unnecessary, but game destroying from that point.

thats fine the rules require u to reach >50% value at arena which i have....when u go 1 wisp until 5 in 1100 i would be more weary of ur play style then mine...since i was yolo mortar its understandable

You are yolo mortar, and 7/1 at level 10? Do you think that is tolerable? I intended to play as a holder but I reached higher lumber and income than yours. You cost this game.

indeed i failed my lane, but thats no reason to ban someone just like you building like a noob is no reason to ban you....holder with chief is not at all worth the cost

dont you wonder why you have negative win ratio?

So much QQ....

locked.

(00:32 / Allied) ifSerendipity: Guys
(00:34 / Allied) ifSerendipity: Can i go holder?
(01:37 / Allied) rocknrolled: we have no holder
(01:41 / Allied) rocknrolled: all are yolo
(02:04 / Allied) rocknrolled: plz 2 wisp asap blue
(02:09 / Allied) rocknrolled: dont try holder
(02:31 / Allied) rocknrolled: free scout "D
(02:31 / Allied) ifSerendipity: do we get
(02:34 / Allied) ifSerendipity: after completing 2?
(02:36 / Allied) rocknrolled: 119
(02:41 / Allied) ifSerendipity: after completing 2
(02:43 / Allied) rocknrolled: ....
(02:44 / Allied) ifSerendipity: 119?
(02:45 / Allied) rocknrolled: send 3
(02:57 / Allied) rocknrolled: blue
(03:12 / Allied) ifSerendipity: I think I will stay like this
(03:14 / Allied) rocknrolled: chief is not holder
(03:16 / Allied) ifSerendipity: Catch up some leak 3
(03:20 / Allied) ifSerendipity: No, I have other good units.
(03:27 / Allied) rocknrolled: then reroll
(03:31 / Allied) rocknrolled: get yolo units
(03:43 / Allied) rocknrolled: idc
(03:51 / Allied) rocknrolled: just fucking push
(03:52 / Allied) rocknrolled: wisp
(03:53 / Allied) rocknrolled: blue
(04:01 / Allied) ifSerendipity: Relax
(04:02 / Allied) rocknrolled: 1100 is not for noob play
(04:30 / All) rocknrolled: this fucking retard blue
(04:35 / All) rocknrolled: should not be in 1100
(04:40 / All) rocknrolled: no fucking idea
(04:44 / All) rocknrolled: how to play this game

(05:13 / Allied) rocknrolled: fucking retard
(05:16 / Allied) rocknrolled: holder with chief
(05:19 / Allied) rocknrolled: get a brain
(05:21 / Allied) rocknrolled: stupif fuck
(05:33 / All) rocknrolled: !ff

I'm not just highlighting. You continued to flame after he used !ignore, so let's start with 1 day ban for flaming as you continued and continued. You need to nix the negativity. No one to blame but yourself for your behavior.

@donewithdota I'm failing to see how he began to flame you. You started in with the toxicity, not him. He had good intentions.

For solo sending, I'm banning you 2 days, non appealable. Your intentions were to feed, and it's blatant. For flaming, as I said before, one day. Your toxicity is getting to astronomical levels and it should stop.

All chat logs were pulled directly from the replay, which can be read here. Red instigated and blue used !ignore and red then proceeded to continue flaming after the fact.

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 532846.w3g

Total of 3 day ban, unappealable. He needs to take a break.