ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=6709805
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #19
Your Warcraft III Username: jamzreloaded
Violator's Warcraft III Username: tastay (purple) and woo.j (blue) and lebob
Violated Rule(s): solo sending and antistuck abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): lvl 2 onwards
Any further thoughts: purple antistuck my units on lvl 3 so i dont catch leaks. blue sending solo lvl 2 and 5 then it continued on 12 13. purple also solo sending 12 and 13. both of them non team play. Blue failed heal an cost us extra heal on lvl 7. MULTIPLE rule breakers for both players. please also see their attitude during game. they didnt care at all

(01:16 / Allied) resor: warrior
(01:26 / Allied) resor: send
(03:37 / Allied) resor: we can bo 3
[Before level 12...]
(25:56 / Allied) WOO.J: we should send now
(25:57 / Allied) resor: we should send for income
(25:58 / Allied) WOO.J: for income
(26:47 / Allied) resor: I ignored him and blue [not really needed to ignore blue]
(27:06 / Allied) tastay: guess
(27:09 / Allied) tastay: we sending every lvl then
(27:13 / Allied) WOO.J: i said
(27:19 / Allied) WOO.J: jss this lvl for income
(27:22 / Allied) JamzReloaded: go 14
[between level 13 and 14]
(30:40 / Allied) tastay: but sending 14 vs archers
(30:44 / Allied) tastay: must be one of the worsr decisions
(31:05 / Allied) tastay: i sent 12
(31:08 / Allied) tastay: because blue sent 12
(31:10 / Allied) JamzReloaded: and 13
(31:14 / Allied) tastay: because it was over
(31:17 / Allied) tastay: since nobody is saving
(31:21 / Allied) tastay: it doesnt matter when i send now

-> Blue sending solo level 2 and 5 , refused to team send level 1 and 3.
-> blue and purple (after blue) sending level 12 but red said send 12 aswell, going 20 as purple wanted is just stupid. (they didnt read red's call i guess)
->purple seinding solo for 13. Going 14 without full send is a bad idea but purple didnt tried to tell them before he send solo. He gave up more or less after 12. There was bad communication as red has ignored purple. Was his first solo send and didnt had any impact on the game as the died 14 anyway. Wouldnt ban in that case.
-> after 10 the whole team didnt knew what to do at all, they didnt came to a conclusion what to do.
-> Solo sending Woo.J ✔
-> solo sending tastay ✖

(05:19 / Allied) resor: !votekick woo
(05:19 / All) mrpokemon: A votekick against player [WOO.J] has been started by player [resor]. 5 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.

-> too early to kick someone for sending alone. It was just wave 2 so far.
-> votekick abuse ✔




-> both, tastay and LeBoB used AS to hide units/prevent them from teleporting to the king
-> Blue used AS to steal kills from red
-> votekick abuse tastay, LeBoB, WOO.J ✔



No results for 'holybolt' by Woo.J in DRM
-> teal had to use his heal, if blue had healed the king had survived with about 2,4k hp.
-> refusing to heal ✔



woo.j@uswest.battle.net should be banned for sending solo/refusing to send with team + AS abuse + refusing to heal.
tastay@useast.battle.net should be banned for AS abuse.
lebob@europe.battle.net should be banned for AS abuse.
resor@useast.battle.net should be banned for votekick abuse (warning).

@Jabba41

Wow, impressive! This is like a final exam in a Legion TD ban request, A+. I confirmed everything, and agree with all of your judgments.

woo.j@uswest banned 10 days for solo sending, antistuck abuse, and not attempting to heal the King, plus 5 days from a previous ban request, making that a 15 day ban.
https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=71749

tastay@useast banned 5 days for antistuck abuse. @tastay see me in appeals so we can clear up the rules for ENT18.

lebob@europe banned 5 days for antistuck abuse.

resor@useast banned 1 day for initiating an illegal votekick.

tastay appealed. Still monitoring the others.

No users dodged.