Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 763151.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #9
Your Warcraft III Username: Fillebanan
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Mudman
Violated Rule(s): Built 4/4 in darkgreen / Solo sent before team agreed on sending / Extremly rude behaviour.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): After lvl 10 and further
Any further thoughts: So sad with people who acts like young kids and all they can do is curse and be rude. Suchs people dont beling in the friendly ENT community.
[LTD] mudman @entconnect
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
fillebanan
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 9:19 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
MudMan
- Treant
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:18 pm
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: [LTD] Ban Mudman
never solo sent
I built half a square into dark area which is allowed
rude behavior? check yourself first
just because we lost u feel the need to get something out of the game, just be a man and accept the loss, its not the end of the world.
I built half a square into dark area which is allowed
rude behavior? check yourself first
just because we lost u feel the need to get something out of the game, just be a man and accept the loss, its not the end of the world.
-
fillebanan
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 9:19 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: [LTD] Ban Mudman
Stop acting like a retard and stop playing for a few days and consider your behavoiur. There should be another ban request on your name in a few min since people said your ruined another game after ours. Im just like ENT on my freetime and dont want to see it ruined by jackass people like yourself.
-
Vendeta
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:58 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
[LTD] mudman @entconnect
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 763271.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #13
Your Warcraft III Username: vendeta
Violator's Warcraft III Username: mudman
Violated Rule(s): TK, skip sending on 2, flaming
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Skip sending on 2, whole game we all tryed to help him with build, he didnt wanna listen, he just flamed, he was 5/1 on 7 and he wasnt holder, 7/4 after arena, whole game.. Many reasons to get banned.
Any further thoughts:
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #13
Your Warcraft III Username: vendeta
Violator's Warcraft III Username: mudman
Violated Rule(s): TK, skip sending on 2, flaming
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Skip sending on 2, whole game we all tryed to help him with build, he didnt wanna listen, he just flamed, he was 5/1 on 7 and he wasnt holder, 7/4 after arena, whole game.. Many reasons to get banned.
Any further thoughts:
- These users thanked the author Vendeta for the post:
- fillebanan (Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:36 pm)
D.S. 1989
-
fillebanan
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 9:19 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
RadiantCrystal
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 8771
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:47 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 146 times
Re: [LTD] Ban Mudman
Merged topics
(09:54:07) Jabba41: Hello RadiantCrystal. I'm so glad you became an Admin here because green is the color of hope and whenever your presence brightens up my life i cant thank you enough to know such a person like you. [KING NOW GIVE KISSES]
Spoiler!
-
KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: [LTD] mudman @entconnect
reviewing
- These users thanked the author KinG23 for the post:
- fillebanan (Tue Nov 10, 2015 5:09 pm)
*kisses*
-
getstomped
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:44 am
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: [LTD] mudman @entconnect
@mudman a mod is reviewing the details of the game. No need to spam irrelevant trashtalk.
locked until review.
locked until review.
FFS:
Your = Belonging (ex. Your hat, your hero)
You're = You are (ex. You're banned)
There = Location (ex. Get there fast)
Their = Belonging (ex. Their hero, their item)
They're = They are (ex. They're not helping, They're banned)
Your = Belonging (ex. Your hat, your hero)
You're = You are (ex. You're banned)
There = Location (ex. Get there fast)
Their = Belonging (ex. Their hero, their item)
They're = They are (ex. They're not helping, They're banned)
-
KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: [LTD] mudman @entconnect
[ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #9
@Fillebanan
You have the rules incorrect... you are allowed to build one full space into the dark green area. Please review them on our Wiki.
(24:20 / Allied) Understacker: we should just send 12
(24:24 / Allied) Understacker: then max value
(24:48 / Allied) Understacker: we go 12 ?
(24:51 / Allied) Understacker: to max value ?
(25:40 / Allied) Understacker: decide plz
(25:48 / Allied) vicioustimes: idc
(26:01 / Allied) Fillebanan: 12 sucks
(26:17 / Allied) mudman: i sent
(26:19 / Allied) mudman: when we said 12
(26:22 / Allied) mudman: it sent 20 sec later
(26:23 / Allied) mudman: from delay
The team was indecisive about the 12 send. As confirmed by the 25:59 action by mudman, his send was indeed delayed. He made the decision to get income in time since there was no agreed upon team decision. One teammate had no idea, the other didn't care. Only filebanan voiced his opinion, which was moot since it occurred after the send. You had more than enough time to voice your opinion on this matter.
No bans issued for this game. Reviewing the next one now.
@Fillebanan
You have the rules incorrect... you are allowed to build one full space into the dark green area. Please review them on our Wiki.
(24:20 / Allied) Understacker: we should just send 12
(24:24 / Allied) Understacker: then max value
(24:48 / Allied) Understacker: we go 12 ?
(24:51 / Allied) Understacker: to max value ?
(25:40 / Allied) Understacker: decide plz
(25:48 / Allied) vicioustimes: idc
Code: Select all
25:59 <mudman> 0x10: Immediate order: [Ballista] (flags: 0x0040)(26:01 / Allied) Fillebanan: 12 sucks
(26:17 / Allied) mudman: i sent
(26:19 / Allied) mudman: when we said 12
(26:22 / Allied) mudman: it sent 20 sec later
(26:23 / Allied) mudman: from delay
The team was indecisive about the 12 send. As confirmed by the 25:59 action by mudman, his send was indeed delayed. He made the decision to get income in time since there was no agreed upon team decision. One teammate had no idea, the other didn't care. Only filebanan voiced his opinion, which was moot since it occurred after the send. You had more than enough time to voice your opinion on this matter.
No bans issued for this game. Reviewing the next one now.
*kisses*
-
KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: [LTD] mudman @entconnect
[ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #13
From the start, your team started flaming mudman for his build. He did nothing wrong for starting with Captains, as that is a legitimate yolo strategy.
Level 2 - mudman missed the send with the team after being told to do so. Seeing as this was the only instance and was very minor, no ban will be issued for this missed send.
By rule: Refusing to cooperate when asked to do so several times by sending alone and not save-send with teammates to win. This was not broken.
Furthermore, it is not "bannable" to be 5/1 on level 7. This was not intentional team killing. He had harder yolo units and tried to hold as best as he could in the mean time. This is not LIHL where we require vouches to play the game, so players are bound to have bad games with towers they are not familiar with. If you think you are skilled enough to play LIHL, then I suggest you apply where players will be able to work with all kinds of towers.
@Fillebanan @vendeta
If you dislike playing with this user, just avoid him in games and wait for the next lobby. If you guys didn't start the attitude with him in the first place, I doubt he would even flame, which was minor anyways.
Both games denied.
From the start, your team started flaming mudman for his build. He did nothing wrong for starting with Captains, as that is a legitimate yolo strategy.
Level 2 - mudman missed the send with the team after being told to do so. Seeing as this was the only instance and was very minor, no ban will be issued for this missed send.
By rule: Refusing to cooperate when asked to do so several times by sending alone and not save-send with teammates to win. This was not broken.
Furthermore, it is not "bannable" to be 5/1 on level 7. This was not intentional team killing. He had harder yolo units and tried to hold as best as he could in the mean time. This is not LIHL where we require vouches to play the game, so players are bound to have bad games with towers they are not familiar with. If you think you are skilled enough to play LIHL, then I suggest you apply where players will be able to work with all kinds of towers.
@Fillebanan @vendeta
If you dislike playing with this user, just avoid him in games and wait for the next lobby. If you guys didn't start the attitude with him in the first place, I doubt he would even flame, which was minor anyways.
Both games denied.
*kisses*
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 160 guests