Page 1 of 1
[ID] HA-GAYYY@Europe - Teamkiller VK abuse
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 7:23 pm
by Haunt
Replay Link:
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=7948440Game Name: [ENT] Island Defense #26
Your Warcraft III Username: Haunt
Violator's Warcraft III Username: HA-GAYYY
Violated Rule(s): Teamkill & votekick abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): TK: 1:10 or so
votekick:
Any further thoughts:
@Av1oN I think you should start teaching ID community about what happens if you don't votekick rule breakers.. Ban all who didn't vote to kick (because I did tell everyone why I was initiating the kick) and maybe people will slowly start to learn.
P.S. Will add official replay later if needed.
Re: [ID] HA-GAYYY@Europe - Teamkiller VK abuse
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 1:52 am
by blasian365
haunt just loves to report ppl, he probably killed a shelter, so we should kick him and bann all who dont agree with u, so wat about flammors who swear just once or learners who dont understand the game, ends up feeding, i think we should banned them as well just bc they arnt good enough, ya if he tks, u can just report instead of trying to kick him for killing probably 1 shelter but if its like a base, thats different, stop trying to hurt the island defense population, ur the only one haunt who wants probably everyone banned
Re: [ID] HA-GAYYY@Europe - Teamkiller VK abuse
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:13 am
by Haunt
Am I surprised that you break rules yourself? (Looking at your posts) No, I'm not. Someone as retarded as you, who think they can break the rules and nothing happens isn't exactly in position to argue about anything ban related.
ENT has rules to make games better. You break those rules, you aren't good for the community, and therefor should stay away. Me, or anyone else, reporting rule breakers improves the games and community, not the other way around.
So go away with your bs.
Re: [ID] HA-GAYYY@Europe - Teamkiller VK abuse
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 12:10 pm
by Haunt
Replay Link:
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=7951952Game Name: [ENT] Island Defense #11
Your Warcraft III Username: Haunt
Violator's Warcraft III Username: HA-GAYYY
Violated Rule(s): Once agian, he TKs. This time my ARC, RC, shelter and one mana pool. Also refused to leave my base. Pretty sure he tried to votekick me once as well...
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 15:45
Any further thoughts:
@Av1oN Time to swing da hammer.
m3fist0 stole my bones but I think idc about that. Didn't affect the game too much.
Re: [ID] HA-GAYYY@Europe - Teamkiller VK abuse
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 2:50 pm
by fishy_joes
funniest tk ive ever seen i loved it
Re: [ID] HA-GAYYY@Europe - Teamkiller VK abuse
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 11:22 pm
by blasian365
ppl swear, should i kick him and try to get him ban, thats minor flamming, thats against the rules and new players are feeding, minus will kick them and anyone who dont agree should be banned, acciedental blocking, thats breaking rule, he blocked me minus will ck him and ban him as well, thats wat haunt wants, he wants everyone to be banned, maybe ppl fear vking rule breakers bc it could be vk abuse. i dont mind if the rule breaker is reported, but trying to get all the non voters bann just bc they dont agree with u?, ppl abuse vk so much we dont know when to ck or not so if more than half thinks its no big deal, get wat 6 or 7 ppl banned? that wil surely hurt the Island defense population rather than help it, i could be like u and report anyone who swears yep or acciently feed or block but no im acutally nice
Re: [ID] HA-GAYYY@Europe - Teamkiller VK abuse
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 12:35 am
by Merex
Enough. Locked.
Re: [ID] HA-GAYYY@Europe - Teamkiller VK abuse
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:16 pm
by Merex
@Haunt HA-GAYYY@europe.battle.net will be banned on all offenses.
Players who didn't votekick in replay #2 the first time -
Chinaborste, Seketh - will be banned.
Though note: Ban duration will be low as warning since pink left after the first (was gone before the 2nd & final was initiated) and yellow voted in the second although if they had voted in the first - you'd still have your ARC.