ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 158944.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #52
Your Warcraft III Username:
Violator's Warcraft III Username: epic_feeder
Violated Rule(s): killing himself like his name clearly states a 400 elo
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): untioll we finally kicked him like 3rd or 4th try worth
Any further thoughts: you like people to play with people like this 400 elo
also i think a person might be using him to gain elo not all feeders do it for fun sometimes is to give elo

(14:11 / All) gonzoindahouse: posting you refusing to kick
(14:15 / All) Settlers: he's not intentionally feeding
(14:17 / All) Settlers: he's just noob
(14:19 / All) Settlers: not banable
(14:23 / All) gonzoindahouse: read his name
(14:29 / All) gonzoindahouse: you are getting banned
(14:33 / All) Settlers: I yesed it noob
(14:39 / All) gonzoindahouse: then not talking to you
(14:41 / All) gonzoindahouse: AGAIN
(14:45 / All) BigRonColemanz: A votekick against player [Epic_Feeder] has expired.
(14:49 / All) Settlers: such a whiney bich
(14:54 / All) gonzoindahouse: twice i told u that
(14:57 / All) Settlers: u need ur dick sucked
(15:04 / All) gonzoindahouse: you fucking mc donalds idiot
(15:06 / All) gonzoindahouse: fuck yourself

By minute 9 rhasta died 3 times. None of that was intentional. He was getting ganked by bara, and had to lane with huskar. Not an easy thing to survive. And then you accept to votekick him, which is a clear votekick abuse. When you kick a player, there is a message warning you that kicking someone that is new to the game is abusive.
At 9:26 you announce in all chat that you are going to post everyone for refusing to accept this abusive votekick.

(11:31 / Allied) Settlers: !votekick epic
(11:31 / All) BigRonColemanz: A votekick against player [Epic_Feeder] has been started by player [Settlers]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
(11:31 / All) BigRonColemanz: Type !yes to vote.
---> (11:31 / All) BigRonColemanz: ** Note: !votekick should only be used to kick players breaking a rule. You should not votekick players new to the game! <---
(11:32 / Allied) gonzoindahouse: !votekick epic
(11:34 / Allied) gonzoindahouse: !yes
(11:34 / All) BigRonColemanz: Player [gonzoindahouse] voted to kick player [Epic_Feeder]. 6 more votes are needed to pass.
(11:34 / Allied) SCIZORMETIMBERS: !yes
(11:34 / All) BigRonColemanz: Player [SCIZORMETIMBERS] voted to kick player [Epic_Feeder]. 5 more votes are needed to pass.
(11:47 / All) gonzoindahouse: his name plus 400 elo
(11:49 / All) gonzoindahouse: kick plz
(11:58 / All) gonzoindahouse: ILL POST U REFUSING TO KICK

Two minutes later you are still threatening that you will "post them for refusing".

(14:23 / All) gonzoindahouse: read his name
(14:29 / All) gonzoindahouse: you are getting banned
(14:39 / All) gonzoindahouse: then not talking to you
(14:41 / All) gonzoindahouse: AGAIN
(14:54 / All) gonzoindahouse: twice i told u that
(15:04 / All) gonzoindahouse: you fucking mc donalds idiot
(15:06 / All) gonzoindahouse: fuck yourself
(15:19 / Allied) gonzoindahouse: !votekick epi
(15:19 / All) BigRonColemanz: A votekick against player [Epic_Feeder] has been started by player [gonzoindahouse]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pa
(15:22 / All) gonzoindahouse: kick or ban

At this point rhasta is 1-4. Not as bad as you are claiming to be. No intentional death so far.
I notice rhasta starts playing more safe now, following the team around, trying to avoid getting charged by bara.

After a while it is clear that rhasta is not a good player, but still. Nothing justifies what you 've been doing.
Minute 23 you accept another abusive votekick.
(25:55 / Allied) gonzoindahouse: !yes
(25:55 / All) BigRonColemanz: Player [gonzoindahouse] voted to kick player [Epic_Feeder]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.
Minute 27 you start another votekick, again a clear abuse, and manage to kick him.

(30:00 / Allied) gonzoindahouse: !votekick epic
(30:00 / All) BigRonColemanz: A votekick against player [Epic_Feeder] has been started by player [gonzoindahouse]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pa
(30:15 / All) BigRonColemanz: A votekick against player [Epic_Feeder] has passed.
(30:15 / All) BigRonColemanz: Epic_Feeder was kicked by vote.

Then, once more, you threaten with ban.
(30:25 / All) gonzoindahouse: SERIOUSLY GETTING BANNED

In conclusion, epic_feeder was just a new player. But as i am sure you already know, ENT community is friendly towards new gamers. Epic_feeder should not be banned.
As for you, you should take a look at ENT's rules, memorize them, and please try to follow them. Your behavior could get you into trouble if someone decides to report you.

http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... ming:Rules
http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... :DotARules

@FalenGa nice review.
Agree with above. Rasta clearly inexperienced player. He ended the game 1-16, but there was also an 0-11 and an 0-13 in this game. Singling him out and postulating plant is not evidence based.
Denied.