Page 1 of 1

[LTD] Loganx2008@useast

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 2:43 am
by BonerBender
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 223819.w3g
Game Name: [ent] legion td mega #50
Your Warcraft III Username: SmegmaMountain
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Loganx2008@useast
Violated Rule(s): Game Ruin
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Start of game till 5 minutes in when we kicked him
Any further thoughts: I'm not sure what his deal was but he leaked rounds 1 and 2 heavily without us sending once. He kept bitching about game being stacked (which it was no doubt....not on purpose but it sure did happen). But that's besides the point you dont get to game ruin just because you dont like the match up. I asked his team if he was game runing they said yes and we kicked him out....

(04:54 / All) SmegmaMountain: how is red leaking....
(04:57 / All) SmegmaMountain: we haven't sent
(05:16 / All) Loganx2008: not really trying, my team has decided they want to play a 300+ greater deficit so why bother

Re: [LTD] Loganx2008@useast

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 11:25 am
by FalenGa
0315 he sells his phantom.
Goes to wave 2 with 190 value.
Was kicked at wave 3.

This looks like a gray zone incident. On the one hand, he did send his tower and went wave 2 and 1 with crazy low value. On the other, he could just be new. And he did seem like a new player, which is no reason for a kick. In my opinion, this kick was rushed, and barely justified.
Unless there is history for similar reasons, he should not be banned.

Re: [LTD] Loganx2008@useast

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:44 am
by SeriouslyStrange
Previous ban for not healing king in TK fashion.
Plus this:
(05:16 / All) Loganx2008: not really trying, my team has decided they want to play a 300+ greater deficit so why bother
Banning for five days for intentional gameruin.