The amount of confusion is too much to bear
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:36 am
Warcraft III username: Kortalian
Realm: USEast
Situation: Already "not banned" and one of ban reasons is inaccurate
Why you should be unbanned: Because I already posted an appeal pre-ban when i realized the situation, and a moderator said I would not be banned. Also one of the ban reasons is innacurate.
I was in a game with LolYou where a player I had never met tk'ed and fed me as titan. At the time, I didn't realize refusing to votekick a player that was breaking a rule was against the rules. [It's posted in general rules, not Island Defense rules, so I over looked it]. There is nothing in the rules about accepting feed from a player when I am the titan.
See ban request here: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=22348&p=101896&hilit=kortalian#p101896
When I noticed that LolYou had placed a ban request, I scrutinized over the rules because I thought I hadn't broken a rule. When I did find out that I did, [not vote kicking], I decided to place an appeal. As I said, I made a mistake, I'm sorry, It won't happen again.
See ban appeal here: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22350
The verdict on my ban appeal was NOT BANNED. However, ~8 hours later, R.T.M.X. Banned me for 3.5 days, trumping my "not-banned" appeal already. He states "However, kortalian will be banned for 84 hours (3.5 days) for refusing to votekick for feed and TK." I would like to note I NEVER TK'd. Not once, never. Also, how can you TK when you are the titan? I performed no such action.
The only rule I broke was refusing to vote kick the rule breaking player. (this quote is at the bottom of the ban request I linked)
So why is R.T.M.X. Allowed to trump another moderator? I don't know the hierarchy of ENT, but I feel this is extremely unfair.
Realm: USEast
Situation: Already "not banned" and one of ban reasons is inaccurate
Why you should be unbanned: Because I already posted an appeal pre-ban when i realized the situation, and a moderator said I would not be banned. Also one of the ban reasons is innacurate.
I was in a game with LolYou where a player I had never met tk'ed and fed me as titan. At the time, I didn't realize refusing to votekick a player that was breaking a rule was against the rules. [It's posted in general rules, not Island Defense rules, so I over looked it]. There is nothing in the rules about accepting feed from a player when I am the titan.
See ban request here: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=22348&p=101896&hilit=kortalian#p101896
When I noticed that LolYou had placed a ban request, I scrutinized over the rules because I thought I hadn't broken a rule. When I did find out that I did, [not vote kicking], I decided to place an appeal. As I said, I made a mistake, I'm sorry, It won't happen again.
See ban appeal here: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22350
The verdict on my ban appeal was NOT BANNED. However, ~8 hours later, R.T.M.X. Banned me for 3.5 days, trumping my "not-banned" appeal already. He states "However, kortalian will be banned for 84 hours (3.5 days) for refusing to votekick for feed and TK." I would like to note I NEVER TK'd. Not once, never. Also, how can you TK when you are the titan? I performed no such action.
The only rule I broke was refusing to vote kick the rule breaking player. (this quote is at the bottom of the ban request I linked)
So why is R.T.M.X. Allowed to trump another moderator? I don't know the hierarchy of ENT, but I feel this is extremely unfair.