Complaining about an moderator.

Processed complaints will be moved here.

Moderator: Oversight Staff

paschy90
Aura Tree
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:33 pm

Complaining about an moderator.

Postby paschy90 » Mon Nov 19, 2018 10:54 pm

https://gyazo.com/48a828ff0011359394c6f57917e9c351

This is a valid strategy in legion 1200. You sell your lane and use the gold for more push. He is using this reason for an 5 days ban. Why are admins able to ban people in the LTD section if they dont understand the game?

MudMan
Treant
Posts: 446
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 56 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Re: Complaining about an moderator.

Postby MudMan » Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:40 am

paschy90 wrote:https://gyazo.com/48a828ff0011359394c6f57917e9c351

This is a valid strategy in legion 1200. You sell your lane and use the gold for more push. He is using this reason for an 5 days ban. Why are admins able to ban people in the LTD section if they dont understand the game?


please add the link to your ban request

Augustinus
Treant Protector
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Complaining about an moderator.

Postby Augustinus » Thu Nov 22, 2018 6:14 pm

I believe this is the replay in question:

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=137052

I even was in that game. Overall really messy shit in team west. I don't see how selling all units at once did help u anyhow since you can't even push that fast, but taking the whole picture into consideration, a ban didn't have to apply here. You could argue that the sui was poorly executed and poor gameplay is not bannable. If I am correct red (who is the op of that brq) also refused to go 10 holder with hydra warlocks. That was far worse than purp selling units.

nicolai123
Treant
Posts: 391
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:37 am
Location: Islamic State
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 37 times
Contact:

Re: Complaining about an moderator.

Postby nicolai123 » Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:39 am

1200+ rule regarding selling from wiki:
Selling value at any point in the game in order to gain an advantage by stalling time on a racing level is forbidden
. Dont see how it applies to selling on 9 or 10 unless it was a race on 10 or 12 maybe.

The justification for the ban has nothing to do with this rule either.

Stiff_Maistar
Treant Protector
Posts: 683
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:07 pm
Location: Norway
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Complaining about an moderator.

Postby Stiff_Maistar » Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:13 pm

The 1200+ selling value rule wasnt used for this game.
I would assume he just used the general rules.
1.Do not teamkill (ex. blocking, maliciously using spells, destroying/hiding/stealing/massing items, selling towers, etc).
These users thanked the author Stiff_Maistar for the post:
KiwiLeKiller (Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:39 pm)
What did snow white say when the dwarves saw her naked?
7-UP
https://www.facebook.com/TehLurdOfTehReingsOfficial/videos/710971672378120/

gurjop
Forest Walker
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 5:52 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Complaining about an moderator.

Postby gurjop » Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:00 pm

But he didn't, it's normal for suiciders who can't comeback to sell towers in order to push more. That's what i've read was happening here.
holymoly: lot of ppl want play with me.
ROFL

User avatar
TrueChaos
ENT Staff
Posts: 3291
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 12:21 am
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Complaining about an moderator.

Postby TrueChaos » Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:53 pm

After reviewing this replay, -> viewtopic.php?f=24&t=137052

00:18:12 sold Blood Raider.
00:18:16 sold Raider.
00:18:19 sold Orc Warlock.
00:18:25 sold another Orc Warlock.
00:18:26 sold another Blood Raider.
00:18:27 sold Magnataur.

You sold all towers which is a rule violation that was being enforced under game ruining rules.
Do not teamkill (ex. blocking, maliciously using spells, destroying/hiding/stealing/massing items, selling towers, etc).

User avatar
Quetra
Protector of Nature
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:11 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: Complaining about an moderator.

Postby Quetra » Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:47 pm

I should mention that instead of posting a screenshot of my reply, you should have simply linked the appeal, as it gives my response context:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=137761

You were saying that you were banned only because of a misclick on regen and not mentioning the main reason for the ban in the appeal, leading to a number of other people complaining about the ban being unfair on that basis. This wasn't the reason, and I denied the appeal since you were being misleading and not engaging with the main reason for the ban.

User avatar
Merex
Oversight Staff
Posts: 6626
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 297 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: Complaining about an moderator.

Postby Merex » Sat Jan 19, 2019 7:34 pm

While the question of the "suicide" strategy is coming into play here, this simply isn't the case. You can see in the chatlog that the team wasn't in favor of this and so forth.

(18:41 / Allied) DarkKnight: he sold
(18:42 / Allied) DarkKnight: everything ?
(18:44 / Allied) Legion90: gg
(18:52 / Allied) Legion90: we die
(18:53 / Allied) Legion90: :)
(18:55 / Allied) Legion90: and red 75
(18:57 / Allied) Legion90: LMAO
(18:58 / Allied) DarkKnight: did he just sell all his towers ?? ?
(19:02 / All) Legion90: gg
(19:03 / Allied) kageschwump: ye
(19:04 / Allied) kageschwump: he did
(19:05 / Allied) DarkKnight: why
(19:08 / Allied) kageschwump: idk
(19:10 / All) Legion90: red hydra locks, says he cant hold 10
(19:10 / Allied) kageschwump: says you tk
(19:14 / All) Legion90: goes 7 5
(19:16 / Allied) Legion90: !ff
(19:21 / Allied) DarkKnight: he is so bann
(19:26 / Allied) iusedtolovemee: 48
(19:28 / All) DarkKnight: he is getting bann
(19:32 / Allied) ratedlol: wtf is wrong with u purp

After having seen the replay/another mod as-well, I agree with the both of them and will side that this, in combination with the above, is a violation of our game ruining rule and that the ban was valid.

That being said, no signs of mod abuse.

Processed.


Return to “Processed Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests