ban appeal treatment

[RadiantCrystal]

@King23 looks like you got yourself a compliant

[KinG23]

Maybe if you read the votekick abuse rules and linked them like I asked you could see how you broke the rules? This is your second ban for votekick abuse, so by you not cooperating in appeals of course I am not going to unban you early.

Votekick abused here:

(30:02 / Allied) Michelle: !votekick agree
(30:02 / All) HairyTits: A votekick against player [Agreements] has been started by player [Michelle]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.

Ban request denied on Agreements here, hence not valid votekick:

https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.p ... ts#p312852

@RadiantCrystal

Not a complaint, but rather a lack of understanding of the rules by the above user as well as refusing to read/link the rules.

Here they are for you to review since you did not do so in appeals:

http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... ng:VKRules

[KinG23]

Do not abuse !votekick: its only purpose is to kick game ruinners who violate ENT's rules and negatively impact the game for either or both teams in the game.

Agreements broke no rules.

[nabo.]

@Michelle

I have not seen the game replay, but several has told me that Agreements played really bad. Being suspicious of game ruining was probably correct, but could have been a bad game too. His plays were on the border and based on king's opinion, he deemed that it was not game ruinning. King did what he did based on his perspective and agreements is no longer a staff with us.

I remember reducing your ban significantly.

If there is any questions you would like to ask regarding our rules, you can approach me on chat for clarifications.