Changing !votebalance requirement for pass

[Bobchi]

Enough people do to make autobalance ineffective. Each of the few times I saw the vote pass, one of the teams got fucked up and the game was one sided. For example, scourge may get the only high-ish 1200 elo player who's just moderately good as well as the 850 elo 0.15 kdr feeder that speaks only Russian (to balance out the high elo, you see, since it's a very good system). Meanwhile, sentinel gets two 1000 elo smurfs who are actually the best players in game and who feed relentlessly on the second guy, who always gets assigned to whoever had the highest elo, because elo is the only thing that matters. This is how autobalance (fails to) work.

Changing the vote requirement to 4 WOULD HELP. Much better than just not doing anything at all to solve the problem.

Don't worry buddy, it won't make the problem worse it will only help.

[Bobchi]

ENT will never change this because they support a corrupt oligarchy of high skill players who play together in stacked teams and destroy other players.


ENT IS NOT FOR THE PLAYERS !!!

[Bobchi]

However the most important reason why this should be denied, is simply because votebalancing has larger effect against those, who don't want it, than not balancing for those, who want it. The first occasion would make more people leave games than the second, therefore it simply cannot be 50:50.

Here is an ENT representative admitting that he sympathized more for stacked teams than struggling players.

[Bobchi]

However the most important reason why this should be denied, is simply because votebalancing has larger effect against those, who don't want it, than not balancing for those, who want it. The first occasion would make more people leave games than the second, therefore it simply cannot be 50:50.

Here is an ENT representative admitting that he sympathizes more for stacked teams than struggling players.

[bezdak]

You see only your side of problem and ignore another. The majority of players is against it or don't care, compared to those voting for votebalance.

Your first point is valid, however you are ignoring the fact that if you get a dummy that cannot communicate at all, the negative game experience stays, therefore it doesn't fix much.

Your second point is simply wrong, mega games almost never take even 10 minutes to fill, during peak hours even just less than half a minute. We had a suggestion to add another mega bot, because it in fact fills up so quickly - these are the facts you cannot argue against.

On the other hand you got many reasons, why this doesn't work, you are ignoring all of them and see only yours. Try to think about it, please, this is not, how the discussion works.

[aRt)Y]

Seeing you are the only one in favor of it, denied.