LTD 1v1 new rule

Suggestions will be moved here once processed.

Moderator: Oversight Staff

User avatar
HodoR_
Forest Walker
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:47 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: LTD 1v1 new rule

Postby HodoR_ » Thu Aug 24, 2017 1:45 pm

Played a lot of 1v1's and didn't know that. I can say for sure, that a host picking AP is EXTREMELY rare, most people would leave if red would call that early game.

Good to know tho, thats one hell of a bug :shock:
Hold the door!

User avatar
HazarDous
Staff Department
Posts: 9051
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:36 pm
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 227 times

Re: LTD 1v1 new rule

Postby HazarDous » Fri Aug 25, 2017 8:38 pm

aRt)Y wrote:@hazardous input for 1) ?


bezdak wrote:Because most on people playing it but not the mode setters have no idea about the glitch. Changing builder is pretty much a necessity after early game, since builders are not balanced and if you don't know the glitch, only randomly join an -ap mode and get ban for something you don't know about is rly odd. For this glitch only a mode setter should be punished imo.


Since this should be temporary ( @broud3r ), I'd just go for the easier path. That is, banning the mode altogether as it is simple; easy to announce, easy to enforce for mods. On the opposite side, allowing mode but banning switching seems to be a mess, hard to explain to users & hard to enforce.
These users thanked the author HazarDous for the post:
KiwiLeKiller (Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:40 pm)

KiwiLeKiller
Treant Protector
Posts: 601
Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 12:44 am
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 120 times

Re: LTD 1v1 new rule

Postby KiwiLeKiller » Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:41 pm

HazarDous wrote:
aRt)Y wrote:@hazardous input for 1) ?


bezdak wrote:Because most on people playing it but not the mode setters have no idea about the glitch. Changing builder is pretty much a necessity after early game, since builders are not balanced and if you don't know the glitch, only randomly join an -ap mode and get ban for something you don't know about is rly odd. For this glitch only a mode setter should be punished imo.


Since this should be temporary ( @broud3r ), I'd just go for the easier path. That is, banning the mode altogether as it is simple; easy to announce, easy to enforce for mods. On the opposite side, allowing mode but banning switching seems to be a mess, hard to explain to users & hard to enforce.

100% agree. Anyway, everyone playing ap is just for abusing the bug.
"in a moment of extreme passion"
- Beastman (2017)

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: LTD 1v1 new rule

Postby aRt)Y » Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:23 am

@hazardous but "I just checked and confirmed that his glitch/bug also happens with -sd and -ar modes. So those would also need to be banned and -sdgm and -argm be allowed. -sd and -ar also include the gm and cb, so that's the only way to restrict it."

So we would have to ban any mode which is not gm
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: LTD 1v1 new rule

Postby aRt)Y » Fri Sep 08, 2017 7:32 am

@Bezdak @Broud3r Suggestion denied based on the assumption that this will (is?) fixed.

Please DM the Staff Dept. an ETA.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “Suggestion Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests