ENT Gaming

to play civ war 3v3 mode game, should be waiting for long time in the lobby

because civ war is not very popular

if ent bot make civ war 1v1 mode, it would be good and fun

@tskim

I believe Civ War is meant to play tri-lane (3 players minimum), isn't it?

Anyway, any support from the community towards your suggestion?

yes that's right.
civ war is 3 lane game
basically play 3v3 but can play 1v1 not in bot game
i don't know about civ war community but
i think many civ war players want to can play 1v1 game in ent bot game

@tskim

We will need more members from the community to consider this suggestion.

hm ok i will tell other civ war players about this suggestion

Having civ wars to be 1v1 totally ruins the idea of the trading route and the control points.. As such, I would suggest that the OP should recommend for in house 1v1 game (mid lane only I suppose) instead of making it autohosted just because it takes longer time to start 3v3... End of the day, we need more opinions from other players...

1v1 means you'll control all 3 players, so it doesn't ruin the idea of the control points...

Well if you look at it that way, then allow players to be able to votestart with min 2 players then. The effect is still the same even with the autohosted 1v1 game isn't? Would not that be easier to handle instead of autohosting it 1v1?

Suggestion seems more to reduce waiting time or break up stacked teams. By the map, all modes between 1v1 and 3v3 are possible.

@tskim
Do you want Ent16 to become a 1v1 bot?

@RaptorXI @khspww94 @supersexyy @khspww94 @tskim

I want input from the community on whether they would like to be able to start 1v1 games or not. (Reduce !votestart requirements)

If no one wants to play 1v1, I won't bother uak with it.

Great, lets give it a try... but that repetition of my name twice.. lolz

You might have to wait some weeks to get enough opinions by the community. We aren't big, some don't talk English and will never register at a forum. If it boosts our bot's activity, why not implement a !votestart? But in my opinion you get the full pleasure of the game only when playing 3:3.

@khspww94
About "ruining the idea of control points and trade points", supersexyy is right. The amount of players in a team doesn't affect game mechanics.

What I meant by ruining it is the fact that one man have to control all 3 lane might not be possible for some players... I do however notice some players is able to do so... But to really make the game fully 1v1 is outrages for the civil wars community... All I see is that, implementation of votestart at least with 2 players might just be a better way instead of autohosting it...

i meant 1v1 play is control 1 player and play 3 lanes or 1-2 lane
control 3 players is too hard for almost players i think

if making another 1v1 civ war bot is hard or not possible

allow to use !votestart in lobby at least with 2 players it could be goood and better way i think too

thanks for replies