Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/9128353/
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #68
Your Warcraft III Username: soybeen @useast
Violator's Warcraft III Username:
Piiixi @ EUROPE
Nothard @ USEAST
Violated Rule(s): Game ruin by both (intentional), refuse to defend, solo play, flaming by whisper + griefing
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Piixi - griefs and comes mid
(05:33 / Allied) Piiixi: im mid
(05:34 / Allied) Piiixi: done
(05:39 / Allied) Piiixi: u cant carry
he continues to grief and does not help in team battles. he just watches and stands back
(04:39 / Allied) amabates: slar come
(04:48 / Allied) amabates: wtf
(04:52 / Allied) amabates: wow
(04:57 / Allied) amabates: slar pussy
(05:15 / Allied) soybeen: u were behind tower
(05:21 / Allied) amabates: slar u chicken behind tower
(05:41 / Allied) amabates: slar u been hiding behind tower all game
(06:09 / Allied) soybeen: hes griefing now
I get ganked top and slar is with me. he sees me gets ganked, refuses to cast and runs away. purposely getting me killed
(15:29 / All) Piiixi: awesome
(15:32 / All) Piiixi: 0/3. mid
(15:45 / All) kawabonga: not like you were doing anything
16:05 / All) Triangle: its ok to be scared sometimes
Slar refuses to initiate fights and waits till i go in and die. he had a chance to stun but refused to.
(19:10 / Allied) amabates: tank someone
(19:20 / Allied) amabates: slar
(19:20 / Allied) amabates: go
(19:25 / Allied) amabates: omg
(19:55 / Allied) amabates: slar
(19:55 / Allied) amabates: wow
(20:00 / Allied) amabates: u fucking retard
(20:01 / Allied) soybeen: timestap 18:00
(20:01 / Allied) amabates: u just sit back
(20:04 / Allied) amabates: and watch everyone die
(20:28 / Allied) amabates: slar sit back ALL game
(20:37 / Allied) amabates: slar wants lich to tank
Northard - grief
LB refuses to defend when they push
(12:24 / Allied) amabates: d
(12:27 / Allied) amabates: lb
(12:28 / Allied) amabates: wtf u doing
(12:29 / Allied) amabates: come mid
all game while sentiel pushes he goes to a difference lane and wastes his tomb
Any further thoughts:
[DOTA] Piiixi @ EUROPE & Nothard @ USEAST - SECOND OPINION
Moderator: ENT Staff
[DOTA] Piiixi @ EUROPE & Nothard @ USEAST - SECOND OPINION
Last edited by soybeen on Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: [DOTA] Piiixi @ EUROPE & Nothard @ USEAST - SECOND OPINION
Emperor wrote:https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=106109
Current player is banned for same behavior. Feel free to process.
Grow up man, you've accomplished nothing here. You are just mentally ill and this is the only way you feel some sort of power. It's sad and pathetic. You went out of your way to get me banned for something of no harm to anyone.
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: [DOTA] Piiixi @ EUROPE & Nothard @ USEAST - SECOND OPINION
@soybeen what evidence do you have that the moderator did not watch the replay? If you have none, as I suspect, then remove that perjorative comment and then this will get reviewed.
Re: [DOTA] Piiixi @ EUROPE & Nothard @ USEAST - SECOND OPINION
because he essentially admitted it.BeerLord wrote:@soybeen what evidence do you have that the moderator did not watch the replay? If you have none, as I suspect, then remove that perjorative comment and then this will get reviewed.
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: [DOTA] Piiixi @ EUROPE & Nothard @ USEAST - SECOND OPINION
If that is your conclusion, then the only evidence that that really represents is your complete lack of judgement. Please remove the comment, and this will get reviewed.
Re: [DOTA] Piiixi @ EUROPE & Nothard @ USEAST - SECOND OPINION
BeerLord wrote:If that is your conclusion, then the only evidence that that really represents is your complete lack of judgement. Please remove the comment, and this will get reviewed.
It has been removed awhile ago.
Re: [DOTA] Piiixi @ EUROPE & Nothard @ USEAST - SECOND OPINION
Hello,
Min 4, slardar and lich are bottom lane against zeus + rilay. ES is coming to gang ... However, lich dies and slardar only has ~ 350 hp left. So slardar only stuns them once and back before they can kill him. ES arrives too late. I can't see anything wrong here. You were late, lich had died before you arrived and slardar had less than 50 % of hp against 2 range spell casters.
(05:15 / Allied) soybeen: u were behind tower
(05:21 / Allied) amabates: slar u chicken behind tower
(05:41 / Allied) amabates: slar u been hiding behind tower all game
=> He was actually right. You came late, and he was with lich ...
Then he comes mid but does not even stay 1 minute there and went top. I do not see anything wrong. He can go anywhere he wants to...
At min 15, he did nothing wrong. What could he do? You got ganked and died, he saved his life. I can't see how he could have saved you anyway ...
At min 20, he did not help much but he could not do much either. Gondar had bkb. Leshrac had agha. Zeus had agha. Pugna had agha. Rylai had agha. ES did not have dag. He stayed back and waited the teamfight to engage and see if he could help. It's true that he did not help much but this is not game ruining considering the forces in presence ...
About the other user:
LB refuses to defend when they push
(12:24 / Allied) amabates: d
(12:27 / Allied) amabates: lb
(12:28 / Allied) amabates: wtf u doing
(12:29 / Allied) amabates: come mid
=> Actually he was lvl 5 and he needed levels. He had pushed the only tower that you got (middle) with slardar so I do not think that he was willing to ruin on purpose but to level up a little bit to actually help the team and catch up with the game. When you told him that, he took lvl 6 and went mid. 1 scourge and 1 sentinel died and he was there then.
For the above reasons this request is denied.
Min 4, slardar and lich are bottom lane against zeus + rilay. ES is coming to gang ... However, lich dies and slardar only has ~ 350 hp left. So slardar only stuns them once and back before they can kill him. ES arrives too late. I can't see anything wrong here. You were late, lich had died before you arrived and slardar had less than 50 % of hp against 2 range spell casters.
(05:15 / Allied) soybeen: u were behind tower
(05:21 / Allied) amabates: slar u chicken behind tower
(05:41 / Allied) amabates: slar u been hiding behind tower all game
=> He was actually right. You came late, and he was with lich ...
Then he comes mid but does not even stay 1 minute there and went top. I do not see anything wrong. He can go anywhere he wants to...
At min 15, he did nothing wrong. What could he do? You got ganked and died, he saved his life. I can't see how he could have saved you anyway ...
At min 20, he did not help much but he could not do much either. Gondar had bkb. Leshrac had agha. Zeus had agha. Pugna had agha. Rylai had agha. ES did not have dag. He stayed back and waited the teamfight to engage and see if he could help. It's true that he did not help much but this is not game ruining considering the forces in presence ...
About the other user:
LB refuses to defend when they push
(12:24 / Allied) amabates: d
(12:27 / Allied) amabates: lb
(12:28 / Allied) amabates: wtf u doing
(12:29 / Allied) amabates: come mid
=> Actually he was lvl 5 and he needed levels. He had pushed the only tower that you got (middle) with slardar so I do not think that he was willing to ruin on purpose but to level up a little bit to actually help the team and catch up with the game. When you told him that, he took lvl 6 and went mid. 1 scourge and 1 sentinel died and he was there then.
For the above reasons this request is denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests