[LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

User avatar
Slomosapien
Treant
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:12 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 14 times

[LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Postby Slomosapien » Tue Sep 26, 2017 6:12 pm

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 822169.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #10
Your Warcraft III Username: SlomoSapien
Violator's Warcraft III Username: junnker99@entconnect
Violated Rule(s): possible MH
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts:
(12:09 / Allied) junnker99: I HAVE MH ENEMY NO SEND

I know saying you have mh is not enough, but he/she called their sends everytime
These users thanked the author Slomosapien for the post:
nms (Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:29 am)

Zeratul

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Postby Zeratul » Thu Sep 28, 2017 9:26 am

After reviewing:

[*] They saw harlot on 3 (which got fed), on 5 ur team leaked again and they saw pink with 2 lods + locks and harlot mid again, getting more feed -> So sending on 8 was their best choice, since harlot was gonna hold 7 (and judging on the harlot, sending 8 was the logical send)

[*]On 6, u saw their units (2 upped dragons) and still leaked to king - You had a fed harlot holder -> reasonable to expect they won't send (they had immo, but slow pushes due to spawns, so it was clear they were skipping 7 due to you having a harlot holder + possible LoD mid, and that send on 7 would do nothing to your team)

[*]And once you saw they had immo without upping much the king, it became clear they were sending on 8 (due to harlot)

[*]On 10, you only got a ghoul each + they never upped king (they burned heals) -> they skipped 10, and judging by your units, a 12 send was obvious (harlots, aqua + harlot and wolverines - even pink wasn't that strong either to sustain a hold for 12)

[*]When you send 12, ballistas + commanders are expected (and you can somehow guess the amount of it, if you count the time that it takes inbetween each one)

So altho he said he had mh (sounding stupid), nope - it's explainable by your units, their units, leaks, push/heals, etc. (No fogclicks found either, altho had he fogclicked, the map itself would have mentioned it - and none of the players ingame streams either - at least that im aware of)

EDIT: Theres another maphack report on this user viewtopic.php?f=8&t=118800
Last edited by Zeratul on Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

legionlikeaboss
Armored Tree
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:40 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

[LTD] junnker99@entconnect MAPHACK

Postby legionlikeaboss » Sat Oct 07, 2017 10:21 pm

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 872570.w3g
Game Name: [ent] legion td mega #18
Your Warcraft III Username: td_pro
Violator's Warcraft III Username: junnker99@entconnect
Violated Rule(s): maphack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 4:14
Any further thoughts:
(04:14 / All) junnker99: really yellow hermit :?
He says this right as i misclick on herm, before anyone can see.

legionlikeaboss
Armored Tree
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:40 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect MAPHACK

Postby legionlikeaboss » Sat Oct 07, 2017 10:26 pm

The next game he was on my team...more evidence below:
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 872719.w3g
(04:01 / Allied) junnker99: send 3 enemy
(07:38 / Allied) junnker99: enemy ea cross and demon
(12:29 / Allied) junnker99: enemy send 7 !

Zeratul

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect MAPHACK

Postby Zeratul » Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:27 pm

After reviewing:

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 872570.w3g

Code: Select all

4:14 [All] junnker99: really yellow hermit :?


This is called before round begins - and seems too accurate to be a "coincidence"

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 872719.w3g

Code: Select all

(04:01 / Allied) junnker99: send 3 enemy
(04:17 / Allied) junnker99: go val for 3


They had sent on 1, so it's reasonable to expect a send on 3 (but tbh, his chat looks more like an affirmation, than a possibility)

Code: Select all

(07:38 / Allied) junnker99: enemy ea cross and demon


Well the demon is LoD - they saw it on 1 when your team leaked - and judging by your leaks from 1 (and overall killing speed), it was possible to know there was a cross and ea, but still would require extreme focusing on enemy killing time (which i dont think is the case here, judging by all of the evidence)

Code: Select all

(12:29 / Allied) junnker99: enemy send 7 !


Possible to expect, but again, looking at possibilities - your team could have went king instead of having oj holding 7

Adding these current events, with the previous reported viewtopic.php?f=8&t=118059&p=459785&hilit=junnker99#p459785 (The previous brq now makes a lot more sense)

I'm pretty sure hes maphacking (that hermit call with no sight at all, seconds after being sent, is just shady lol), and should be banned for it

legionlikeaboss
Armored Tree
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:40 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Postby legionlikeaboss » Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:11 am

Another MH accusation. Not coincidence.

User avatar
broud3r
ENT Staff
Posts: 1502
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 11:00 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Postby broud3r » Sun Oct 29, 2017 4:47 am

Junnker99 banned 1 year for maphacking.
Attachments
9822169.w3g
(350.46 KiB) Downloaded 26 times
9872570.w3g
(399.41 KiB) Downloaded 29 times
These users thanked the author broud3r for the post:
nms (Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:28 am)

Zeratul

Re: [LTD] junnker99@entconnect possible MH

Postby Zeratul » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:58 am

@Broud3r looking at the replays attached, im pretty sure u noticed this too viewtopic.php?f=8&t=118800 :P You can process that 2nd one too (or merge with this one, for more evidence i guess) ^^ Thanks


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests