LooseYouself@useast

[Sk-73]

2cd fail call is by CrazySkeleton maybe u need to open eyes when u check replay nobody was called anything then skele called no dd go 20

[Michonne]

https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9155771

That's the game mich is talking about. First call was send 12 (by his buddy ToxicClogger, also applying), 2nd was his call to not send 17, coz no lumber. 2x TK call. gg wp

!nosupport

lmao y that was joke but i still support. everyone do mistakes. i played alot with him and hes more than good for lihl and his king ctrl is pro ( you jelly of his king control kreuter? lol )

[Crazy_Skeleton]

https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9155771

That's the game mich is talking about. First call was send 12 (by his buddy ToxicClogger, also applying), 2nd was his call to not send 17, coz no lumber. 2x TK call. gg wp

!nosupport

on lvl 17 I got convinced not to send 17 and i changed my mind last second not to send. So i can take the blames.

I dunno who d fuck sent 12 1st, was it sized@megaplayer.extranoob.com or toxicclogger@mega1200noob.dodgehim.com but 1 of them shall be banned!

[Sk-73]

Yellow sent alone after i called bad call bad solo send we where confuse shit happen no need to report like michonne said we all had + and - btw i dont think its the good place to troll/flame with ure joke.com

[mega-tuby]

i support !!! he is very good and cool player who i met in 1200+. From him i did learn alot and get improve from it.

[n1ll3]

Engie replay was good. You went 5/0 for 2 and 6/1 with 270 value for 3 after they send 2. So no ob and no mistake in this game.
Your Ygg replay was also ok.

I also played some 1200 games with you the last weaks and i saw only minor mistakes in your builds and a good kc.

BUT i agree Ace, Kiwi, Esca an Kreuter that you have issues with your teamplay. However i never saw a bad behaviour or flaming.

I will trial vouch you so you can prove that you are a teamplayer.

!vouched LooseYourself

Congratulations on being accepted for trial into the Legion TD Mega In-house League! Fun opportunities and challenging higher quality games are awaiting just for you!

Here are a few things you need to make sure you do:

• Read the rules and information section thoroughly: LIHL Rules & Information.
• Get to know who your Moderators are: LIHL Staff.
• Install GProxy for disconnection protection (highly recommended!): GProxy download and installation guide.

As a new member to the LIHL community, you will be placed on a trial status for approximately 3 weeks. As a trial member you will be given the same rights and privileges as any other member of the LIHL. However, as a trial member, your performance and attitude will be monitored closely by the Moderators. We understand that it may take some time to adjust to LIHL game plays, but we expect that you will learn and adjust quickly.

Moderators reserve the right to revoke your vouch status at any time during your trial period without notice due to poor performance or attitude. If you do pass the trial period and become fully vouched, we expect you to maintain high levels of performance and a good attitude - an expectation for all of our members. There are extensive unvouch and ban protocols in place to ensure compliance.

LIHL appreciates your interest and is delighted to welcome you. Happy Gaming! :)

[Crazy_Skeleton]

GZ SLIMAK2!

[Mind]

so like usual, the opinion of the lihl-members dont count shit? 5 (f i v e) people are having issues with this guy, but whatever?!
why do people even bother to open a public thread when they apply?
just send a pm to a lihl-mod and they decide whether they give u a trial or not. but dont start a hypocritical "discussion" here. thx.

[TinSoldier]

@iwontdance makes a good point in my opinion. I won't speak in support ur unsupport of the vouch req, but attitude and teamplay can play just as much a roll as skill in LIHL. I mean this is the whole reason we got rid of eldryan who imo was above average for skill level in the league but was just difficult to play with due to his behaviour. Anyone can behave themselves for 2 week trial and then become a piece of shit afterwards and we all know how hard it is to get someone unvouched after they get accepted.

Perhaps review some more games, or give it more time? This vouch req is barely 1 day old and i've seen some ppl have their req sit for 5 days + no need to rush and cause problems

[Diablo_]

There are multiple reasons why we don't always follow the feedback from LIHL players (tho without counting it seems there are >50% supports anyway?).
One of the biggest one being that they are often not objective nor representative. Most often they have just played 1-2 games with them and then judge them by the probably already clouded memories about these game. So it's usually either a friend -> support or "hey I had troubles with him once" -> no support.

If someone actually watches replays or makes a thorough post explaining their experience with the applying player in multiple games it is surely helpful for us, but this doesn't happen too often.

Another point is that we don't judge behaviour in public games too much. Maybe he does behave poorly there but as long as he acts properly in LIHL it is none of our business. And whether he will or will not act properly we will see in the next few weeks.

Not to mention stupid reasons that make no sense like:

didn't draw for me multiple times on 1200 when there is DCer, so its gonna be a no for me dawg

[Crazy_Skeleton]

@iwontdance makes a good point in my opinion. I won't speak in support ur unsupport of the vouch req, but attitude and teamplay can play just as much a roll as skill in LIHL. I mean this is the whole reason we got rid of eldryan who imo was above average for skill level in the league but was just difficult to play with due to his behaviour. Anyone can behave themselves for 2 week trial and then become a piece of shit afterwards and we all know how hard it is to get someone unvouched after they get accepted.

Perhaps review some more games, or give it more time? This vouch req is barely 1 day old and i've seen some ppl have their req sit for 5 days + no need to rush and cause problems

Tin u rly say something about behave! I LITERLY LAUGH! U r MY MAN NIGGA!

Love :* HahAhHAHAHAahaha

[Crazy_Skeleton]

(...)
Another point is that we don't judge behaviour in public games too much. Maybe he does behave poorly there but as long as he acts properly in LIHL it is none of our business. And whether he will or will not act properly we will see in the next few weeks.

Not to mention stupid reasons that make no sense like:

didn't draw for me multiple times on 1200 when there is DCer, so its gonna be a no for me dawg

Good writing Dia, i laugh AGAIN (no sarcasm)

[TinSoldier]

There are multiple reasons why we don't always follow the feedback from LIHL players (tho without counting it seems there are >50% supports anyway?).
One of the biggest one being that they are often not objective nor representative. Most often they have just played 1-2 games with them and then judge them by the probably already clouded memories about these game. So it's usually either a friend -> support or "hey I had troubles with him once" -> no support.

If someone actually watches replays or makes a thorough post explaining their experience with the applying player in multiple games it is surely helpful for us, but this doesn't happen too often.

Another point is that we don't judge behaviour in public games too much. Maybe he does behave poorly there but as long as he acts properly in LIHL it is none of our business. And whether he will or will not act properly we will see in the next few weeks.

Not to mention stupid reasons that make no sense like:

didn't draw for me multiple times on 1200 when there is DCer, so its gonna be a no for me dawg

i don't like him as a person, he seems like an asshole with no manners. Really diablo i think your own comment is pretty stupid. How someone behaves in pub shouldn't be dismissed or called nonsense because as i said before, attitude and manners is as much a part of lihl as skill is or we would not have unvouched eldryan.

[Mind]

i remember the "old" days, when some vouch requests were just denied due to too much negative feedback about the behaviour (e.g. adiiii...).
so i have to agree with tin, of course the attitude shud matter - whether its public or not. i for myself can say that i ve played many games with hodor on 1200+ and he always knew the things better and started to flame fast and harsh. and if his aka really is "worstplayer" like kreuter mentioned, then he hasnt changed a bit.
but nvm, im inactive since the bots went down anyway and i dont know if im coming back soon, so i shud not put too much effort in here

[FadingSuns]

it is really a big big fail to vouch this guy. Seems that he only hides his real face while playing with some lihl players. I have faced issues with this guy since years, always same story. I talking about many games. At the end, this guy always find a reason to blow the game and start provoking everyone on his team.

Im so surprised on how are vouch request handled here. I support Bescuits point of view.... from now on just send PM to mods and thats it. We count less than 0....