Second opinion on 2 requests.

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby matdas » Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:18 pm

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=107328&p=423458#p423458

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=107328&p=423469#p423469



@SLSGuennter
@hazzardous

They know the rules, for halo to say that they did not is plain ignorance. They built them full well knowing they broke the rules. They say "oh i thought you could build 9" is a load of crap.

Friend gets 5 days ban but they just get a single warning? I don't think so.

Edit: a quick look gives:
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=107313&p=423492&hilit=servants#p423492 5 days
viewtopic.php?f=172&t=107337&p=423482&hilit=servants#p423482 5 days
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=107320&p=423434&hilit=servants#p423434 5 days
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=107267&p=423418&hilit=servants#p423418 2 days
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=107113&p=423195&hilit=servants#p423195 5 days
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=107226&p=423182&hilit=servants#p423182 2 days
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=107192&p=422992&hilit=servants#p422992 3 days



Just a warning ban for this is ridiculous.

Why are they combined? they are two requests on two different people two different games.

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby matdas » Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:30 pm

As for follow accusations. I shouldn't even comment on such lies. We have never ever abused any bug. We are disgusted by such. You all can review our games, they are public. I dare you to find one replay (especially if u claim you saw us doing it, that means u can search for it very fast) that any of us abuse servant bug/glitch or any other bug for that matter. As for spawn point building. yeah we did it. its a strategy (to be honest poor one as far as winning goes), that is fun, but there is no rule that says its not allowed. It has some advantages early, but basically from lvl6 it falls off. It's just a fun act to make "easy" games more interesting.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=106984#p422357


Caught them in a lie, they deserve more than a "warning ban" for "not knowing they servants were banned"

User avatar
thinu
Treant
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:38 am
Location: Poland
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby thinu » Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:56 pm

Jesus, serious haters here. Like I told the other dude saying BS in request u mentioned. Stop writing when ur emotional. Anger, rage, aren't the good advisors logic is. When u r at this state, try deep breathing, count to 10, hide in the closet, do sth, but don't write or say anything until u calm down.
---
No One Is Perfect...

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby matdas » Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:00 pm

Logic: you are getting special treatment for lying to the mods.
Logic: you lied about ever using bug abuses/exploits and got away with it
Logic: you deserve a 2-5 days ban.
Logic: you are a hypocrite about bug abuse.

Emotion:
thinu wrote:Jesus, serious haters here. Like I told the other dude saying BS in request u mentioned. Stop writing when ur emotional. Anger, rage, aren't the good advisors logic is. When u r at this state, try deep breathing, count to 10, hide in the closet, do sth, but don't write or say anything until u calm down.

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby matdas » Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:02 pm

Admins should lock this before others start posting such as thinu from their "emotions" to clog this up and try and turn this around.

Admins can PM me if they have any questions.

User avatar
Archew
Aura Tree
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 11:06 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby Archew » Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:25 pm

Mysteriousdewd wrote:
Taco is also known by the username @thinu

https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.p ... 28#p423458


matdas wrote:
As for follow accusations. I shouldn't even comment on such lies. We have never ever abused any bug. We are disgusted by such. You all can review our games, they are public. I dare you to find one replay (especially if u claim you saw us doing it, that means u can search for it very fast) that any of us abuse servant bug/glitch or any other bug for that matter. As for spawn point building. yeah we did it. its a strategy (to be honest poor one as far as winning goes), that is fun, but there is no rule that says its not allowed. It has some advantages early, but basically from lvl6 it falls off. It's just a fun act to make "easy" games more interesting.
https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.p ... 84#p422357


Caught them in a lie, they deserve more than a "warning ban" for "not knowing they servants were banned"


so, TaCo here, Thinu, is not me :)
You're right we were perfectly aware slaves are not allowed, i also read it on the forum and saw it was only allowed under certain circumstances, but yesterday me and ripjoe5 played against daemonation, who had apparently talked to Halo_mauler about slaves not being strictly disallowed if you only did ''9'' slaves, which i consider 8 slaves and 1 slavemaster. as for the game it's here
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9205914
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9206088
these games WERE AFTER the comment that (dew/thinu) made, that you recited up there, and also just before our game against you, im sorry we had to implicate you in that i guess.
and we each only did it in 1 game,
if we get banned for it , sure i i understand it's all fair and stuff, it shouldn't be allowed in the first case, but thing is we got into the understanding that building 9 slaves were allowed :) - just one thing tho, there's a difference between building slaves enmass and getting 10k value at lvl 10, or simply building 9, IF i do get 5 days ban on your second opinion, that is all good and i wouldnt mind at all. as for the future i wont build any more as what daemon said clearly wasnt true
Last edited by Archew on Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.

rip_joe5
Forest Walker
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 5:22 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby rip_joe5 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:34 pm

@matdas @mysteriousdewd both this users have a serious problem with me and are looking for any excuse to get us banned and honestly am sick of it they are mad cause a viewer went into their stream and was bugging them I did not send anyone to your stream and didn't even say anything too you so stop with the accusations yes we used 9 slaves cause someone in game just before told us Halo told him that is was fine and we were playing that same guy but done with you 2 guys bashing Myself Dew Taco and thinu so grow up

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby matdas » Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:54 pm

Glad you think my one maybe two times against you is "serious problems" and I don't stream I have issues with people who bug abuse when they post that they do not. If you wait till I get home from work I can post a more detailed reasoning after going over the reply and grab a few forum posts.

The mod was wrong in giving you false info and you and him should both share the punishment. Not him giving you a free pass

-via mobile

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby matdas » Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:21 pm

Yes there is a differenc @archew and still it is a banned unit.


Notice how they attack me personally and instead of going at the request. Sad. I have a lot of history at ENT and have zero problems. Even now I have no problems personally with these people. But it is clear that they have problems with me. I made a lot of enemies here and I don't have anything against them. But to attack me like this for no reason is laughable. I use my facts not my emotional opinion such as others in this topic. With this, if an admin would lock this topic I will pm them tomorrow morning with a full detail about this case involving more proof amd gold etc along with another topic that is relevant.

-via mobile

User avatar
Archew
Aura Tree
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 11:06 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby Archew » Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:34 pm

@matdas how was my reply in any way offensive against you? it wasnt :)

+ i said if they wanted to ban me im fine with that cause it was my bad, i just specified a reason for it.

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby matdas » Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:35 pm

Not you there is a new paragraph to respond to the others @archew

Edit: hate using phone

-via mobile

User avatar
Haunt
Oversight Staff
Posts: 4423
Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 9:19 pm
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby Haunt » Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:10 pm

Locked till review.

BeerLord
Protector of Nature
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: Second opinion on 2 requests.

Postby BeerLord » Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:47 pm

OP has asked me to process this, as he is satisfied with the discussion that has taken place and would like this to proceed no further.
Processing.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests