Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/lod/game/9493417/
Game Name: [ENT] LoD -mds6bod2fn #62
Your Warcraft III Username: DreadPirateRob
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Starchaser (at least him, some of the rest didnt vote as well)
Violated Rule(s): Blue was afk from the start, still afk first we kindly asked to kick him and wed play instead of draw ...
they didnt kick him!
Blue was 1:14:1 (the one kill he just last hitted) in the end, we asked twice to kick him again, as he was obviously feeding and was the main
target of pink (starchaser) all game long.
Any further thoughts: It was basicly 4 vs 6 all game long, if we woulda known they refuse to kick the feeder, we prob woulda drawn 2.
Blue is awful with chosen skills as well, but with random skills he was nothing but food.
Pls ban at least pink, who didnt vote once and took greatly advantage by feeding of blue !!!
[Lod] Starchaser [uswest]
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:56 am
- Location: Canada
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: [Lod] Starchaser [uswest]
Below is my opinion for the claims above, and what I've found by using DRM and watching the replay
AFK:
Potential Game Ruin:
Vote-kick : Failure to vote
Concluding Thoughts:
granules@USWest
Being afk for 9 minutes at the beginning of the game during champion/ability select can affect the end game in general. Though you may have fallen behind, ensuring your jungle is warded with observer/sentry wards is huge when you don't want to not die.
Kwaza_return@USWest, mimic@USEast, kikino@Eurobattle, lUX@USWest
(mimic@USEast and kikino@Eurobattle did vote on the 2nd vote)
Failure to vote a potential Game Ruiner when presented with clear evidence at the start of the game. The individual was AFK with no hero selection which can be seen on the scoreboard.
I would recommend more people due to the other votes not passing, however, the first vote should have been the one that went through. The other votes either had a lot of people from the previous vote missing the second vote, or the person returned and they were potentially allowing them to play.
If i had to note what rules were broken during this game:
AFK:
Spoiler!
Potential Game Ruin:
Spoiler!
Vote-kick : Failure to vote
Spoiler!
Concluding Thoughts:
granules@USWest
Being afk for 9 minutes at the beginning of the game during champion/ability select can affect the end game in general. Though you may have fallen behind, ensuring your jungle is warded with observer/sentry wards is huge when you don't want to not die.
Kwaza_return@USWest, mimic@USEast, kikino@Eurobattle, lUX@USWest
(mimic@USEast and kikino@Eurobattle did vote on the 2nd vote)
Failure to vote a potential Game Ruiner when presented with clear evidence at the start of the game. The individual was AFK with no hero selection which can be seen on the scoreboard.
I would recommend more people due to the other votes not passing, however, the first vote should have been the one that went through. The other votes either had a lot of people from the previous vote missing the second vote, or the person returned and they were potentially allowing them to play.
If i had to note what rules were broken during this game:
Code: Select all
granules@USWest
• Do not ruin the game on purpose: Do not go away from keyboard for an excessive amount of time, especially without telling other players beforehand, and/or refuse to play the game in an attempt to ruin it. Neither are you allowed to grief by resetting the afk timer.
Kwaza_return@USWest, mimic@USEast, kikino@Eurobattle, lUX@USWest
(Up to the staff member, but if ban is implemented for failure to votekick maybe consider a lenience for mimic/kikino for voting on the second vote-kick)
• If a votekick is initiated to kick a visible game ruiner, all players are obligated to !yes.
- Albi
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:24 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: [Lod] Starchaser [uswest]
It seems like a misunderstanding to me, considering scourge team was full korean some of them might not know english therefore i will deny this part of the request.
Granules banned 3 days
Granules banned 3 days
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests