Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 912493.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #54
Your Warcraft III Username: Pizza
Violator's Warcraft III Username: eromon
Violated Rule(s): Solosend, Abusing anti stuck, Refusing to play in Team
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): round 2-3 anti stuck on creeps( around 5-7min) , Round 8 Solo send (13 min) round 17 Solo send (35 min )
Any further thoughts:
[LTD] eromon
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
Karils
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Michigan
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
- Contact:
Re: [LTD] eromon
Reviewing replay, checked all antistuck uses by EROMON in the specified time period.
This one is a bit odd to explain, so I'll put it in steps:
Yellow leaks->Orange antistucks his units that are still alive so he can catch the leaks->EROMON antistucks the creeps themselves to make them avoid orange's units. This repeats on both waves 2 and 3.
I am unsure if this counts as AS abuse under the rule which states no kill-stealing teammates, but even if not, it could be considered TK to an extent, because it causes gold for the team to be lost via decreased bounty to mid.
At 13:29, EROMON does send militia solo, without saying anything to his team.
At about 34 minutes, EROMON makes his decision to send despite his team mates not wanting to:
EROMON = solo send twice, AS abuse/TK (not sure which it falls under)
Re-reviewed, editing my decision on the AS abuse accordingly.
This one is a bit odd to explain, so I'll put it in steps:
Yellow leaks->Orange antistucks his units that are still alive so he can catch the leaks->EROMON antistucks the creeps themselves to make them avoid orange's units. This repeats on both waves 2 and 3.
5:03 <EROMON> 0x11: Point order: ancestralspirit (X: 1680.36, Y: 3843.32, flags: 0x0040)
7:10 <EROMON> 0x11: Point order: ancestralspirit (X: 1498.23, Y: 4386.47, flags: 0x0040)
I am unsure if this counts as AS abuse under the rule which states no kill-stealing teammates, but even if not, it could be considered TK to an extent, because it causes gold for the team to be lost via decreased bounty to mid.
At 13:29, EROMON does send militia solo, without saying anything to his team.
At about 34 minutes, EROMON makes his decision to send despite his team mates not wanting to:
Spoiler!
EROMON = solo send twice, AS abuse/TK (not sure which it falls under)
Re-reviewed, editing my decision on the AS abuse accordingly.
-
Unitil
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 5130
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:56 am
- Location: Canada
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: [LTD] eromon
Confirmed the above, and agree with karils review.
As the user is already banned 20 days for charges similar to this game, and that came after this game, i'll be just processing this request and note that it is included with the other similar charges. Player has shown an overall lack of understanding of our rules and has already been banned extensively.
Processing.
As the user is already banned 20 days for charges similar to this game, and that came after this game, i'll be just processing this request and note that it is included with the other similar charges. Player has shown an overall lack of understanding of our rules and has already been banned extensively.
Processing.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests