[DOTA] vini@uswest

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

not2000elo
Armored Tree
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 3:56 am
Been thanked: 4 times

[DOTA] vini@uswest

Postby not2000elo » Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:14 pm

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10508817
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #18
Your Warcraft III Username: divinerape
Violator's Warcraft III Username: vini@uswest , nadia@europe, vroum@europe, vilainecagole@europe, newaccbcimtrash@europe, simbi@useast, cubanmissle3@uswest. kortiporticopu@europe.... the only one who voted for a clear votekick was fogofwar@useast so out of that whole game everyone except him and I deserves to be bannned as per ENT rules
Violated Rule(s): failure to defend, the rest for refusal of votekick
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 37:30
Any further thoughts: sk refuses to defend multiple times, the rest don't votekick after being warned when clearly sk is farming neuts then their creeps mid when bot is being pushed

Astros
ENT Staff
Posts: 3072
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:40 pm
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 148 times

Re: [DOTA] vini@uswest

Postby Astros » Thu Mar 22, 2018 11:50 am

Reviewed this game.

SK refused to help his team at the latter part of the game.

34:51 - he goes to creep while his team is fighting.

35:20 - goes mid while bot gets pushed. Doesn't listen to his teammates and pushes a mid lane for no reason while his team loses bot rax.

40:20, again, doesn't follow his team this late into the game but decides to farm neutral creeps.

46:00, SK just stands in the base next to them and doesn't cast a single spell. He took zero damage in that fight because he wasn't even there. This was despite sentinel making a comeback and could have used SK's presence in the fight. Ends up dying anyways.


(42:15 / Allied) DIVINERAPE: !votekick vini
(42:15 / All) SIMBI: A votekick against player [vini] has been started by player [DIVINERAPE]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
(42:15 / All) SIMBI: Type !yes to vote.
(42:15 / All) SIMBI: ** Note: !votekick should only be used to kick players breaking a rule. You should not votekick players new to the game!
(42:18 / Allied) vini: !no
(42:18 / Allied) FogOfWar: !yes
(42:18 / All) SIMBI: Player [FogOfWar] voted to kick player [vini]. 6 more votes are needed to pass.
(42:20 / All) VilaineCaGole: Coz you did not try to kick it
(42:21 / All) kortiporticopu: divinerape ow yeah
(42:23 / All) DIVINERAPE: anyone not votekicking will be submitted along with him

Blue votekicks SK at 42:15, though, this was the only votekick. There wasn't a votekick starting from 34:51-42:14 - when the most evident example of game-ruining occurred. Still, scourge refused to kick and pink (VilaineCaGole) basically implies that SK is game-ruining at 42:20 but the only individuals in the game who voted yes to kick SK were divinerape and fogofwar.


Vini should be banned for refusing to help and game-ruining.


The below should be banned for refusing to votekick Vini after it became evident that SK was not participating with the team in defending or in team fights.

nadia@europe
vroum@europe
vilainecagole@europe
newaccbcimtrash@europe
simbi@useast
cubanmissle3@uswest.
kortiporticopu@europe
These users thanked the author Astros for the post (total 2):
not2000elo (Thu Mar 22, 2018 10:03 pm) • IFightForHumans (Thu Mar 22, 2018 6:21 pm)
ENT Custom Games Discord ------------------ https://discord.gg/kGAUdTYZ5B

IFightForHumans
Armored Tree
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:57 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: [DOTA] vini@uswest

Postby IFightForHumans » Thu Mar 22, 2018 5:44 pm

Good looks @ chineseeagle -- helping remove bad players!!

BeerLord
Protector of Nature
Posts: 6656
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 151 times

Re: [DOTA] vini@uswest

Postby BeerLord » Sat Mar 24, 2018 5:26 am

Agree with above review.
vini banned 3 days for game ruin/failure to cooperate with allies/failure to defend.

No bans for failure to votekick. One attempt insufficient. Opposing players need more time to appreciate the need.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests