Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10956343
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #1
Your Warcraft III Username: Tharova
Violator's Warcraft III Username: EkelRavage and NavyRoger
Violated Rule(s): 0 communication, 1st solo sending, 2nd not building for lv 1
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 1st round for not building and around wave 12 for solo sending/king upping
Any further thoughts:
[LTD] EkelRavage@uswest + NavyRoger@eu
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
AceFighter
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:28 pm
-
pr0totype
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [LTD] EkelRavage@uswest + NavyRoger@eu
Ekelravage:
Solo sends at level 1. This player seems new. He doesn't build optimally. This is not a reason for a ban.
Teal solo sends at arena. There is no plan in place. Both sends can be construed as strategy for him. This does not excuse that he solo sends, just that no plan was in place for the arena send.
NavyRoger was trying to gauge placement and missed. It was a mistake.
Had your !ff gone through it would have been considered FF abuse as the game is no where near decided at level 1, whether you think it is or not.
Overall, no bans should be issued for Ekelravage. Only a warning might suffice.
Solo sends at level 1. This player seems new. He doesn't build optimally. This is not a reason for a ban.
Teal solo sends at arena. There is no plan in place. Both sends can be construed as strategy for him. This does not excuse that he solo sends, just that no plan was in place for the arena send.
NavyRoger was trying to gauge placement and missed. It was a mistake.
Had your !ff gone through it would have been considered FF abuse as the game is no where near decided at level 1, whether you think it is or not.
Overall, no bans should be issued for Ekelravage. Only a warning might suffice.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests