Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 095244.w3g
Game Name: dota apem
Your Warcraft III Username: marck_971
Violator's Warcraft III Username: spiritfolk
Violated Rule(s): intentionaly feeding / ruining the game on purpose
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): all the game
Any further thoughts: it was a game that should had been drawn,we lost 5 vs 4 (enemy had techies so is an actualy 3) . This player was a medusa and farmed all the game and refused to help us because " no wards ".
[DOTA] spiritfolk useast.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: [DOTA] spiritfolk useast.battle.net
@marck_971 you need to include the complete game name, as well as provide time stamps and descriptions of the game ruining and intentional feeding.
Re: [DOTA] spiritfolk useast.battle.net
Sorry I dont understand what I should do,the link of the replay have also the time stamps of what happened.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [DOTA] spiritfolk useast.battle.net
What times in the game did he violate the rules. You have to tell what he did at what time ingame.
- Merex
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 297 times
- Been thanked: 175 times
Re: [DOTA] spiritfolk useast.battle.net
@marck_971 Last chance, provide valid timestamps/follow what the above said.
The Slap God - An EoC Story
- ENT Rules, Guides and more can be found on our Wiki.
- Contact the staff & interact with others by joining our Discord.
- Now available: Host A Game UI.
Re: [DOTA] spiritfolk useast.battle.net
ok got it, Well first the played Never helped us in all the game along,just farmed ( badly farmed,he/she doesnt had good items after all this game). Then he/she clearly declared that wont aid the team because " there are now wards". So the generic ruining the game acted all along in the game itself,but the specific part was from the 36:16 minutes ! I hope that is enough,sry first time I write a ban appeal
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: [DOTA] spiritfolk useast.battle.net
I see cautious game play, which was understandable in my opinion given the score was some 32-13. Medussa defended and farmed, and did pretty well not to get drawn into a senseless flame war with pudge. Without wards or a gem and in the presence of a dominating techies, I think it wrong to push and I wouldnt have gone along either.
Denied.
Denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests